An item of interest to ethanol producers and other supporters of ethanol is this announcement by EPA, as further clarified by this announcement by EERE:
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced on November 17 that the 2009 renewable fuel standard (RFS) will require most refiners, importers, and non-oxygenate blenders of gasoline to displace 10.21% of their gasoline with renewable fuels such as ethanol. That requirement aims to ensure that at least 11.1 billion gallons of fuels will be sold in 2009. . . . While the RFS requirement is increasing by about 23%—from 9 billion gallons in 2008 to 11.1 billion gallons in 2009—the percentage requirement is increasing by nearly one third, from 7.76% in 2008 to 10.21% in 2009.
The larger relative increase in the percentage requirement reflects the fact that fuel consumption is expected to be lower in 2009, so a greater percentage of renewable fuel is needed to reach 11.1 billion gallons of renewable fuels. . . .
The 2009 RFS is also pushing up against what is known as the "blend wall." Most gasoline sold in the United States contains at most 10% ethanol (a blend known as E10), but the new RFS requires a slightly greater percentage of gasoline to be displaced with renewable fuel. . . . One way to sell greater amounts of ethanol is to sell E85, a blend of 85% ethanol and 15% gasoline, but despite rapid growth in the number of E85 pumps, there are still only about 1,800 E85 pumps in the United States. . . . To address the blend wall issue, DOE and others are studying the use of mid-range blends, such as E15 and E20, for use in standard gasoline-burning vehicles. Allowing all gasoline blends to contain up to 20% ethanol would double the potential market for ethanol.
The Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 requires that the RFS to have annual increases until it reaches 36 billion gallons of ethanol in 2022, 15 billion gallons must come from corn ethanol and 22 billion gallons from second-generation biofuels. In 2015 corn ethanol is required to reach a peak of 15 billion gallons out of the total renewable fuel target of 20.5 billion gallons. The market share for corn ethanol remains at 15 billion gallons until 2022 when the target total for all renewable fuels reaches 36 billion gallons.
On a purely voluntary basis, gasoline blenders have always used more ethanol than the required minimum because increasingly high oil prices made ethanol an attractive fuel in its own right. Today, 12/1/08, with oil at $50.77/bbl (NYMEX) and RBOB gasoline at $1.095/gal (NYMEX) and ethanol at $1.596/gal at the Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT) it makes no economic sense to blend ethanol with gasoline.The RFS will become binding for the first time in 2009. Gasoline blenders will have to use 11.1 billion gallons of ethanol because that is what the law tells them, not because it makes economic sense
This was always going to happen at some time, given the much more ambitious RFS volume obligations in the 2007 law. It was never going to be possible to blend 20.5 billion gallons into the gasoline supply by 2015 without much wider uptake of E85 vehicles or other modifications of the U.S car fleet. But the unprecedented cyclical reduction in gasoline demand has brought the blending wall much closer.
While I am a supporter of ethanol as a means of reducing our dependence on foreign oil, I am not a supporter of the use of corn ethanol to the extent required by the RFS. Ten billion gallons per year (bgy) of corn ethanol is about the maximum that should be supported, let alone 11 or 15 bgy. Greater amounts seems to be an irresponsible way of utilizing U.S. farm resources at the present time. I would advocate reducing theses requirements to ten bgy and the total requirement from all sources of biofuels frozen at 11 bgy until cellulosic ethanol, biodiesel and biobutanol become more viable sources of fuel; greater amounts can always be produced if the market supports it. In fact it is time to take the emphasis off corn ethanol entirely and concentrate on cellulosic ethanol made from non-food feedstocks and biobutanol which can be used in up to 100% concentrations in current vehicles. After these technologies have been proven to be economically viable, say by 2015, then let market forces determine which flavor of fuel is most viable. Supporters of cellulosic ethanol claim that current corn ethanol production facilities can be easily converted to producing cellulosic ethanol, thus increasing the yield of fuel per acre.
The establishment of a market for ethanol and other renewable fuels is a worthy objective to prepare for future times when the cost of oil once again becomes more onerous and in short supply. The market for corn ethanol has been established and should be maintained. Subsidies for corn ethanol should be dropped as soon as possible, but this will not be possible as soon as I had anticipated, due decreasing prices for oil. I would favor that any subsidies be based on the difference between the cost of gasoline and the cost of ethanol. Because of corn ethanol, markets for biodiesel, biobutanol, cellulosic ethanol and any future biofuels should develop more easily and subsidies be required for only a short time, if at all.
Requiring all new vehicles be flex-fueled vehicles makes a lot of sense to me. This is the least costly way to enable widespread use of biofuels. Some $30 to $100 per car seems to be a reasonable price to pay to enable wider use of biofuels. Pontiac's new G6 is available with a flex-fuel 3.5L V6 at no additional cost over the gas version in the full range of body styles. Is this a sign of things to come? and by an American car company!
Vinod Khosla, the well known Silicon Valley, in his words, venture assistant, to technology based ventures, has a good, seemingly objective, White Paper, Food vs Fuel that should be of interest to readers of this post and thosee interested in the renewable fuels market in general. His view on corn ethanol is very similar to mine (which I developed independently, much before I heard of him), but expressed much more eloquently:
The future that Professors Runge, Senauer and Lester Brown and many other critics of corn ethanol see is similar to what we envision – cellulosic and biomass-based biofuels that offer better potential solutions, higher efficiencies, and a better environmental footprint. However, it is vital to note that none of this would have been viable without corn-ethanol in the first place – none of the university research, financial capital, or political backing for cellulosic would exist without the corn-based version proving its functionality and priming the market and infrastructure. Ethanol in its current manifestations has provided a valuable stepping stone away from the age of oil, and the transition to a cleaner and more environmentally friendly future based on cellulosic biofuels.
such a nice starting blog.. i like ur blog..
Posted by: Calorie Calculator | November 10, 2011 at 08:47 AM
I am so so so glad that this was implemented. Personal efforts are good and all, but when the government starts getting involved in helping the environment we have the opportunity to get so many more people involved in changing the world!
Posted by: Rear-View Camera | November 16, 2011 at 03:16 PM
I'm happy they did this but does anyone know how effective it is now, and if they are holding companies accountable and to the standards of this act?
Posted by: Rug Cleaning Los Angeles | November 16, 2011 at 03:33 PM
I hope that people start taking more actions like this in the world.
Posted by: Auto Lease Los Angeles | November 16, 2011 at 03:46 PM
Is ethanol that much better and more eco-friendly than gas? I didn't do well in chemistry class. Lol
Posted by: Dentist Los Angeles | November 16, 2011 at 04:09 PM
It's only 3 years from 2015, does anyone know if this goal will be reached?
Posted by: Therapist New York | November 16, 2011 at 04:11 PM
Online Calculator
It's really great post.Thanks for sharing it.
Posted by: Account Deleted | November 17, 2011 at 10:45 AM
Excellent article.
Well Done.
Nabil Frik
Posted by: Nabil Frik | November 17, 2011 at 12:10 PM
For those interested Agrion, a business network for energy and sustainability, is hosting an Energy Conference with several government representatives who will touch upon this topic.
Check out the event here: http://www.agrion.org/sessions/agrion-ny-Residential_Demand_Response_and_Enabling_Technologies_.htm
Posted by: Chris | November 18, 2011 at 12:41 PM
This is a wonderful article. The things given are unanimous and needs to be appreciated by everyone.
Posted by: online calculator | November 19, 2011 at 05:26 AM
I like this article very much because it is technical and very much useful for me to gather more knowledge. Good to read...
Posted by: Register domain India | November 21, 2011 at 08:36 AM
I m so fortunate to read your blog. I learned a lot of new things.
Posted by: online calculator | November 22, 2011 at 08:19 AM
coal statistics would suggest the commodity isn't going anywhere. Coal reports show if we have to live with it, we may as well reduce the impact of coal and CCS seems to be the best solution found to date. Cherry www.coalportal.comWhile for some an ideal world would see no reliance on coal industry to produce electricity,
Posted by: coalportal | November 25, 2011 at 04:50 AM
I m so fortunate to read your blog. I learned a lot of new things.
Posted by: online calculator | November 26, 2011 at 04:34 AM
Even now, was it worth it to make the changes they required here?
Posted by: Sacramento Solar Companies | November 27, 2011 at 10:34 PM
The fact that the US was able to reach a state of over production so quickly without negative ramifications (unless you invested poorly) answer many questions about the limitation of biomass.
If you are a Texas oilman or battery maker, ethanol is a threat.
Posted by: Switzer Superannuation Report | November 28, 2011 at 02:29 AM
Online Calculator
It's really great post.Thanks for sharing it.
Posted by: Account Deleted | November 29, 2011 at 09:22 AM
I am feeling so glad reading your post:):)
Posted by: Web Design Cleveland | December 01, 2011 at 04:04 AM
Online Calculator
Thanks a lot for sharing this nice post!You’ve done really excellent job!
Posted by: Account Deleted | December 01, 2011 at 07:58 AM
Renewable energy is the energy for future transport. Should be cheaper and non toxic for people and environment.
Posted by: Antony B | December 09, 2011 at 12:44 PM
フィンペシア通販
フィンペシア通販
フィンペシア通販
フィンペシア通販
フィンペシア通販
フィンペシア通販
フィンペシア効果
フィンペシア通販
フィンペシアの効果と副作用
Posted by: プロペシア 耐性 | December 18, 2011 at 07:11 PM
Thank you for writing valuable info regarding the issue. I am an admirer of your website. Keep up the good job.
Posted by: Bob Johnson | December 21, 2011 at 11:35 AM
This is a wonderful article. The things given are unanimous and needs to be appreciated by everyone.
Posted by: online calculator | December 22, 2011 at 09:17 AM
フィンペシア効果
フィンペシア 飲み方
フィンペシア 初期脱毛
フィンペシアの副作用
フィンペシア 耐性
フィンペシア キノリンイエロー
フィンペシア プロペシア
フィンペシア通販
フィンペシア購入
フィンペシア 偽物
Posted by: フィンペシア効果 | December 24, 2011 at 09:39 AM
フィンペシア通販
フィンペシア効果
フィンペシア副作用
フィンペシア キノリンイエロー
プロペシア ジェネリック
フィンペシア通販購入
Posted by: フィンペシア通販 | December 28, 2011 at 04:50 PM
I would say that out of all the different energy sources I understand ethanol the least.
Posted by: SEO Services | December 29, 2011 at 06:12 PM
no doubt that this all thes invented biofuels can definitely help us save mother earth. But the truth of the matter is that this is not doable as for the moment.
Posted by: premium efficiency motors | December 30, 2011 at 08:05 AM
This blog is very nice... I'm okay about your topic .
Visit my blog : http://energiedurable.secondes.info
Posted by: Lyes | December 30, 2011 at 11:41 AM
Clean Energy Fuels gets $150M in investment
Energy Investments
Posted by: Daily Energy | January 02, 2012 at 04:12 AM
Ethanol production is still below zero sum. It takes more energy to produce and provides less fuel mileage than petroleum-based products.
Posted by: wedding reception las vegas | January 04, 2012 at 05:49 AM
We are trying to maintain our unsustainable thirst for liquid fuels, by doubling up on our practice of unsustainable industrial farming.
Posted by: lakeside wedding reception nv | January 06, 2012 at 01:35 AM
The market share for corn ethanol remains at 15 billion gallons until 2022 when the target total for all renewable fuels reaches 36 billion gallons.
Posted by: wedding flowers las vegas | January 06, 2012 at 05:16 AM
We help you beat the high cost of fuel, with driving and car maintenance tips to save you money on the road.
Posted by: Oven Cleaning Sydney | January 06, 2012 at 05:48 AM
It's good they raised these requirements. Glad to see good things happening.
Posted by: beverage marketing | January 06, 2012 at 04:58 PM
プロペシア通販
プロペシア通販
プロペシア通販
プロペシア効果
プロペシア通販
プロペシア通販
プロペシア通販
プロペシア通販
プロペシア通販
Posted by: プロペシア効果 | January 08, 2012 at 07:09 AM
Very nice post regarding energy crisis. Alternative energy could help in saving the world from the energy crisis.
Posted by: Industrial chemical manufacturer | January 11, 2012 at 12:52 AM
Very nice info there is. Renewable energy could help to face the energy crisis.
Posted by: Industrial chemical manufacturer | January 11, 2012 at 12:54 AM
Love that the EPA did this, good job!
Posted by: beverage flavors | January 11, 2012 at 08:25 PM
フィンペシア通販
フィンペシア通販
フィンペシアの効果と副作用
フィンペシア副作用
Posted by: フィンペシア 効果 | January 13, 2012 at 01:10 AM
Good thing that you continue your subscriptions.We really get feed and Hoping that you can contribute a lot for more improvements.
Posted by: renewable sources | January 15, 2012 at 03:05 AM
ブログの更新楽しみにしています。
Posted by: フィンペシア通販 | January 15, 2012 at 11:50 PM
フィンペシア通販についての知識は大切です。
フィンペシアは医薬品です。
フィンペシア通販について考えてみましょう。
フィンペシア通販について調べました。
フィンペシア通販を知る必要があります。
フィンペシア通販とはどんなものでしょう。
フィンペシア通販についての比較は大切です。
フィンペシア通販を利用するときは慎重にしましょう。
フィンペシアの通販に注意しましょう。
Posted by: フィンペシア通販 | January 16, 2012 at 07:37 PM
Great, thanks for sharing this blog post.
Posted by: Samsung Mobile Price List | January 17, 2012 at 04:29 AM
やはりブログの更新楽しみにしています。
プロペシア通販についての知識は大切です。
プロペシア通販についての比較は大切です。
プロペシア通販を利用するときは慎重にしましょう。
プロペシア通販に注意しましょう。
プロペシア通販についての知識は大切です。
050
プロペシア通販は医薬品です。
プロペシア通販について考えてみましょう。
プロペシア通販について調べました。
Posted by: プロペシア通販 | January 18, 2012 at 10:59 AM
ミノキシジルタブレット通販
ミノキシジルタブレット通販
ミノキシジルタブレット効果
ミノキシジル効果
ロゲイン通販
ロゲイン効果
ロゲイン通販
Posted by: プロペシア通販 | January 18, 2012 at 01:42 PM
Corn ethanol is a loser and subsidies that go to it are locking us into a loser pathway. Stop the subsidies. Give incentives to advanced biofuels based on scientific merit.
Posted by: carpet cleaning bondi | January 20, 2012 at 07:25 AM
プロペシアを安心して買える通販ショップを探しています。
プロペシア通販
プロペシア通販
Posted by: プロペシア通販 | January 20, 2012 at 10:38 PM
I m so fortunate to read your blog. I learned a lot of new things.
Posted by: Blackberry Mobile Price List | January 26, 2012 at 04:35 AM
Good to know the EPA did this. :)
Posted by: access doors | January 30, 2012 at 04:00 AM
Have they raised these anymore?
Posted by: laser hair removal san francisco | January 30, 2012 at 04:09 AM