Using SUNRGI's propriety technology it is possible to produce large amounts of electricity from solar radiation at a wholesale price of US $0.05 / kWh is the lead headline on SUNGRI's website. The system is called Xtreme Concentrated Photovoltaics ™ or XCPV™.
XCPV efficiently concentrates sunlight so than it is more that 1,600 times brighter than the sun. This concentrated sunlight is focused onto triple-junction solar cells photovoltaic (PV) solar cells that convert more than 37% of the sunlight directly into electricity. The technology will enable power companies, businesses, and residents to produce electricity from solar energy at a lower cost than ever before was announced recently by SUNRGI at the National Energy Marketers Association's 11th Annual Global Energy Forum.
"Solar Power at 5 cents per kWh would be a world-changing breakthrough. It would make solar generation of electricity as affordable as generation from coal, natural gas or other non-renewable sources, without requiring a subsidy"
-- Craig Goodman, president, National Energy Marketers Association
"In a little more than a year we were able to develop and successfully test XCPV. We expect the SUNRGI system to become available for both on and off-grid power applications, worldwide, in twelve to fifteen months"
-- Robert S (Bob) Block, co-founder and SUNRGI principal.
What differentiates SUNRGI's XCPV system from other solar energy systems includes:
- Extreme Photovoltaics Concentration
- a propriety, integrated low profile technology for concentrating sunlight
- a propriety technology and methodology for cooling solar cells, allowing the cells have a longer useful life
- A dual axis tracking system that captures 175% more energy than a fixed system
- a low cost, modular system, module shown below, optimized for mass production and enables a power station to be distributed over a number of sites
- a system with less land area or "roof top" requirements than typical solar energy systems, 16X less land than thin film
- a technology roadmap for continuous improvement, the design is upgradeable, allowing it to take advantage of future advances in PV technology
- low-cost field installation
- a custom-designed system for easy operation and maintenance
- SUNRGI’s system costs significantly less per installed Watt than traditional PV technology
The system tracks the sun as it moves across the sky from sunrise to sunset. The performance difference between tracking systems and fixed systems is significant. In a day, SUNRGI's tracking system will capture and convert 175% more sunlight than a fixed system at the same advertised peak power rating.
XCPV prototypes have been built and successfully tested under both laboratory and field (outdoor) conditions.
SUNRGI XCPV technology does not depend upon silicon, and therefore is not affected by the silicon shortage.
I believe the claim for 5 cent electricity (wholesale price) is a first in the solar industry. SUNRGI has developed a low cost module that they claim is "optimized for mass production", has high efficiency and is space saving. They also are projecting that it will be available in 12 to 15 months. That would be quite an achievement for a company that apparently has not produced a commercial prototype and in a document titled Executive Summary dated April 30, 2008 states that "a best-to-date manufacturability, small-scale modular design has been envisioned and calculated. Concept drawings have been completed" and that "Over the near term SUNRGI plans to continue its research and development activities. In particular, the company is creating a demonstrable performance simulation of its concentrated solar energy system that can be showcased to its customers." I wish them the best, as such a product would be welcomed.
Crimminy...all that metal (in the heat sink photo) looks like it will cost more than $0.05/kwh. (Do they really need that much?)
As for the idea of concentrating sunlight onto a small space, it can be done and has been done before. I hope they can do it better, but I'm a little worried this PR will build unrealistic expectations. Wildly overoptimistic expectations or shoddy products can seriously damage a industry. If these guys can't even calculate how much extra sunlight 2 axis tracking provides, it doesn't bode well for their other claims.
Posted by: disdaniel | May 15, 2008 at 02:03 PM
Great post.
Personally, I'm betting big in the solar sector. I believe it will be huge in the future, with rising oil prices. I'm currently holding ESLR, JASO, SOLF and WFR, and considering entering in either ASTI or DSTI.
Stay safe, stops are in, emotions are out!
Posted by: Miguel Salazar | May 16, 2008 at 08:08 AM
From 300-500 suns to north of 1100?
Heat kills semiconductors, so thermal management is key.
I didn't see any reference to MTBF.
Without this data the rest is useless.
When I see MTBF data and a warranty, then I'll get interested in this technology.
Posted by: Thomas Marihart | May 29, 2008 at 02:59 PM
This is just another reason why we need to move as quickly as possible, (much as in the same manner as Kennedy's challenge to get a man on the moon) to alternative energy vehicles.
I know, I know, we wil have to build more electrical plants. B.S!!!
I know of little old engineers that power their cars on solar energy right out of their homes. Don't tell me we aren't smart enough!!!
Posted by: ELMO the Electric Bikes -n- Scooters Guy | June 22, 2008 at 10:40 PM
I can't wait for this, it sounds really great, getting excited about this. Great post. Thanks a bunch, Rick L.
Posted by: Rick L. | December 03, 2008 at 12:42 PM
Adequately tracking a >1000x concentrator is difficult to do at low cost. Their setup shows single axis tracking, with some kind of internal or secondary concentrator, those tend to be less accurate. Count me a sceptic as well.
Even if they are for real, they'd have to have an installed cost of no more than 2 dollars per Watt even in the best locations. The CoolEarthSolar design looks more promising overall, and they're further along comercially. SolFocus indeed has an elegant product, especially the gen2 concentrators. But their installed cost so far is disappointing at more than 10 dollars per Watt. Supposedly, the cost would go down a lot for hundred of MWe plants.
Posted by: Cyril R. | December 04, 2008 at 08:37 AM
Single axis horizontal tracking within the individual unit should be fine as long as there is some way to adjust the 'rack' for day to day vertical changes.
Individual units can fine tune with just enough logic to titrate for maximum output.
The overall system should be able to determine the maximum output from all units and from that create a standard which the other units could use to determine how much they are under performing and adjust or report for maintenance.
--
That said, the new film/coating for PV solar that allows close to 100% of light striking the front surface to be conducted in (rather than reflected off)....
Supposedly this product will eliminate the need to track panels. Should work as well for concentrating lenses?
Posted by: Bob Wallace | December 04, 2008 at 01:37 PM
"a new antireflective coating that boosts the amount of sunlight captured by solar panels and allows those panels to absorb the entire solar spectrum from nearly any angle"
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/11/081103130924.htm
Posted by: Bob Wallace | December 04, 2008 at 01:44 PM
For lower concentrations, easily. But not for higher concentration as sungri claims to work with. The angle of acceptance becomes so small that you absolutely have to have constant high accuracy tracking. This is possible, just not at the cost claimed. I'm not convinced that the cost reduction potential for high accuracy tracking systems is huge, so I'll remain very sceptical at least until they've got some field proof of economics. Judging by the available data, Sungri is still very early in it's development.
Posted by: Cyril R. | December 05, 2008 at 04:16 AM
I'm not sure why absorbing the entire wavelenght spectrum is all that useful. Far infrared is pretty much useless, the energy is too low for the photovoltaic effect. Infrared will probably just heat up your panel, slightly reducing output.
In the past, up-conversion and down-conversion layers have been tried but had only marginal effect on efficiency. Perhaps if the panel absorbs all the wavelengths more effectively, up- and down-conversion could be more effective?
Posted by: Cyril R. | December 05, 2008 at 04:26 AM
As for game-changers, IMHO the holy grail is something like this
Posted by: Cyril R. | December 05, 2008 at 04:27 AM
“As for game-changers, IMHO the holy grail is something like this”
“so I'll remain very sceptical at least until they've got some field proof of economics.”
Posted by: Kit P | December 05, 2008 at 09:59 AM
Exactly Kit. But you're sceptical about anything that isn't conventional and vested interests. Do not confuse fact based scepticism with unreasonable structural bias. Some problems are more likely to be overcome than others. That is not to say infrared nano-antennas aren't extremely risky.
We need ambitious research projects to complement accelerated buildout of proven technologies. Can't depend on it, but not a lot of $ are needed for these research projects and the payoff is potentially huge. Private investors and companies often do not fund such promising research when there is little chance of short term returns. The government however has the long term energy future of the country to consider.
At the very least, they are interesting science projects.
Posted by: Cyril R. | December 05, 2008 at 11:22 AM
Interesting solution... I found an awesome portable device that anyone can use when travelling.
Solio charger is a compact portable device, which will power most cellular, smart, pda and mp3 devices on the fly. Some models will even store energy for use at night.
Posted by: portable solar battery charger | March 26, 2009 at 01:27 PM
this is so good to see. i just love the new technology.
Posted by: wholesale dropshippers sources | March 26, 2009 at 06:49 PM
Before you pop your cork and invest in this company, read this:
http://www.marylandgreenpower.com/greenpower/2008/05/21/22/
Posted by: Dennis | April 07, 2009 at 07:52 PM
i am so glad to hear this. keep up the good work.
Posted by: wholesale dropshippers sources vendors | April 08, 2009 at 02:16 AM
really good
Posted by: SolarForum24.de | July 06, 2009 at 11:53 AM
"In a little more than a year we were able to develop and successfully test XCPV. We expect the SUNRGI system to become available for both on and off-grid power applications, worldwide, in twelve to fifteen months"
Hope it will be as they say.
Posted by: penis enlargement | October 14, 2009 at 12:06 PM
Sounds like the snake oil salesmen are at it again.
Posted by: Yanto | December 13, 2009 at 11:48 AM
Five cents per kw sounds unbelievable. I hope this comes true as many people will benefit from it.
Posted by: Solar Power Technology | December 16, 2009 at 04:51 PM
Tempting blog! Thanks for giving out this astonishing news. You have done fastidious assessment. It can be done without obscurity.
Posted by: 4inkjets Coupon Code | December 31, 2009 at 02:17 AM
A fine example of how solar will soon take over. This efficiency has been demostrated and tested by NREL at only 10 suns.
Collecting heat and electricity from the same solar system is called solar cogeneration. It has already been done by the Colorado team in the solar challenge in DC.
Posted by: Automatic soap dispenser | January 12, 2010 at 08:46 AM
Single axis horizontal tracking within the individual unit should be fine as long as there is some way to adjust the 'rack' for day to day vertical changes.
Individual units can fine tune with just enough logic to titrate for maximum output.
The overall system should be able to determine the maximum output from all units and from that create a standard which the other units could use to determine how much they are under performing and adjust or report for maintenance.
Posted by: Burr coffee grinders | January 12, 2010 at 08:47 AM
I love your thoughts on all of the gas tax relief talk on the presidential trail......
Posted by: Business Process Analysis Training | January 19, 2010 at 10:55 PM
It is using for photovoltaic solar panels, including solar cells, lighting and chargers. To know more..http://energywriters.blogspot.com/.
Posted by: Energy writers | February 03, 2010 at 05:46 AM
Good work...Nice presentation..
Posted by: Anbu | February 03, 2010 at 05:48 AM
Made in China
Posted by: Made in China | March 29, 2010 at 11:37 PM
Red wine and certain polyphenolic substances in red wine such as resveratrol may help prevent heart and arterial disease. According to the "French Paradox," moderate red wine consumption benefits the heart, increases levels of "good" cholesterol, protects against artery damage and fights free radicals.
Posted by: Red Wine Benefits | April 28, 2010 at 06:59 PM
works to lose weight,but indeed we have to know the reason for what causes fat:
Posted by: mbt shoes sale | May 13, 2010 at 04:01 AM
丰胸
Posted by: 丰胸 | May 18, 2010 at 04:04 AM
丰胸
Posted by: 丰胸 | May 18, 2010 at 04:05 AM
丰胸
Posted by: 丰胸 | May 18, 2010 at 04:09 AM
丰胸
Posted by: 丰胸 | May 18, 2010 at 04:10 AM
丰胸
Posted by: 丰胸 | May 18, 2010 at 04:12 AM
丰胸
Posted by: 丰胸 | May 18, 2010 at 04:13 AM
丰胸
Posted by: 丰胸 | May 18, 2010 at 04:14 AM
丰胸
Posted by: 丰胸 | May 18, 2010 at 04:15 AM
丰胸
Posted by: 丰胸 | May 18, 2010 at 04:17 AM
丰胸
Posted by: 丰胸 | May 18, 2010 at 04:18 AM
丰胸
Posted by: 丰胸 | May 18, 2010 at 04:19 AM
丰胸
Posted by: 丰胸 | May 18, 2010 at 04:20 AM
丰胸
Posted by: 丰胸 | May 18, 2010 at 04:21 AM
丰胸
Posted by: 丰胸 | May 18, 2010 at 04:21 AM
丰胸
Posted by: 丰胸 | May 18, 2010 at 04:22 AM
丰胸
Posted by: 丰胸 | May 18, 2010 at 04:23 AM
丰胸
Posted by: 丰胸 | May 18, 2010 at 04:24 AM
丰胸
Posted by: 丰胸 | May 18, 2010 at 04:25 AM
丰胸
Posted by: 丰胸 | May 18, 2010 at 04:25 AM
丰胸
Posted by: 丰胸 | May 18, 2010 at 04:26 AM