From Business Week online March 20, 2008:
. . . If you want to understand why Exxon won't produce more, it helps to listen in to ExxonMobil's presentation to analysts in New York City in early March. Halfway through the three-hour meeting, Exxon management flashed a chart that showed the company's worldwide oil production staying flat through 2012. . . .
Yet even with prices at the pump near all-time highs, Exxon isn't planning on producing any more oil four years from now than it did last year. That means the company's oil output won't even keep pace with its own projections of worldwide oil demand growth of 1.2% a year. . . .
"We don't start with a volume target and then work backwards," Instead, he said, his team examines the available investment opportunities, figures out what prices they'll likely get for that output down the road, and places their bets accordingly. "It really goes back to what is an acceptable investment return for us."
-- Exxon Chairman Rex Tillerson
. . . Since 2000, Exxon's oil output from two of its largest regions, the U.S. and Europe, declined a startling 37%. That's 500,000 fewer barrels a day in just seven years. . . .
Exxon plans on bringing new fields online in Russia, the Middle East, and Africa over the next four years but they won't be enough to generate growth beyond what the company is losing due to the maturation of its fields in the North Sea and Alaska, the nationalization of its fields in Venezuela, and volumes lost due to production sharing agreements with other countries. . . .
Big oil companies can continually miss their targets or even target no growth and still shine on Wall Street due to the peculiar nature of commodity businesses. Less supply of a commodity means higher prices. Higher oil prices mean more profits for the oil companies. Exxon shares have risen 21% in the past year—and even closed a bit higher on Mar. 5, the day of its analysts meeting.
The simple explanation is that the oil companies' share of world production is shrinking as more and more production is controlled by governments.
Posted by: George Bruce | March 24, 2008 at 12:56 PM
The simple explanation is that the oil companies' share of world production is shrinking as more and more production is controlled by governments.
Posted by: George Bruce | March 24, 2008 at 12:58 PM
Even simpler: it makes the most sense for Exxon-Mobil to maximize profit by doing nothing that would lower oil prices, such as expanding output significantly.
Posted by: Ron Fischer | March 24, 2008 at 04:19 PM
Time to Break Glass In Case Of Emergency.
Municipalities had better digest what is in Portland Oregon's Peak Oil Task Force Report called: Descending the Oil Peak: Navigating the Transition from Oil and Natural Gas
http://www.portlandonline.com/shared/cfm/image.cfm?id=145732.
Posted by: Randy White | March 24, 2008 at 04:30 PM
The reality is that the IOCs (International Oil Companies) such as Exxon have been excluded from doing business is so much of the world that they have little capability to influence production and prices. It is correct that the interests of the IOCs -and even less of the National Oil Companies, are not the same as the short term interests of oil consumers. It should come as no surprise if the oil producers were to stretch some of their investments into future production, or even to not pump at maximum volume. This sort of behavior -if it is in fact occurring is actually to the benefit of the consumers, as it should stretch out the transition from cheap to dear oil. Many entities who believe they can benefit from blunting the message of peak oil are trying to do just that. The favorite technique is to argue that there is more oil in the ground than has been consumed so far. That is correct as far as it goes, but the reality is most of the remaining oil is much more difficult to produce than the older depleted fields. This means that capital and "lifting" costs will be much greater than had been the case. Also the amount of engineering expertise per barrel of oil produced is going to increase, at the same time as large numbers of aging petroleum engineers are reaching retirement age. Peak Oil does not mean that oil production will precipitously drop to zero, but is does mean that the age of cheap plentiful oil is over.
Posted by: bigTom | March 24, 2008 at 11:13 PM
If the major oil companies would recognize that they are in the heat supply business, not just the petroleum business, they would be able to find excellent prospects for investing their current cash surpluses. The end of plentiful energy is not over - there is a tremendous reserve of uranium and thorium that has just barely begun to be tapped.
Of course, the particular characteristics of that source of heat are quite different from those of petroleum, but the oil companies are full of smart, adaptable people who are well suited for taking advantage of those differences. The energy density, the lack of emissions, and the accessible reserves located in stable, democratic countries are all advantages that should be exploited.
Of course, it might mean some short term demand destruction for the company's current portfolio of income producing assets, but since that base is shrinking anyway, now is probably a great time for the inevitable transition.
Posted by: Rod Adams | March 25, 2008 at 09:19 AM
Africa and the Arctic are the last two unexplored areas for fossil fuels. Nigeria and the Congo are getting finecombed by the Chinese; and the Russian GAZPROM has exploration teams throughout the Arctic.
37% is pretty dramatic...voluntary cutback to drive up prices to get revenue for a new binge of exploration and refinery building or a shortage of crude?
Posted by: fjh | March 25, 2008 at 09:48 AM
Can oil companies get refineries financed? Without a positive earnings outlook for 30 years (to pay down the debt) they probably can't get funded. Given no new refineries being built, this tells me the oil co's don't foresee 30 years of continued profits.
Unlike foreclosed homes, which can be resold by the bank, what does one do with a refinery that "foreclosed" due to lack of supply in 15 years?
Well, refineries do tend to sit on waterfront property just an electric car/monorail commute to big cities. Maybe the big oil companies' last gasp, around 2025, will be in the real estate business. ;)
Posted by: Lori Glauser | April 05, 2008 at 07:17 PM
I think oil companies see plenty of continued profits in the next 30 years from their existing refineries. They just don't see profit in building new ones. Continuing the real estate analogy, the home they have now suits their needs into the future. Buying a second home would be risky.
Posted by: Clee | April 05, 2008 at 09:18 PM
i do not believe this at all.
Posted by: oilfield equipment | April 03, 2009 at 02:19 PM
An allergy is a type of immune reaction. Normally, the immune system responds to foreign microorganisms or particles by producing specific proteins called anti-bodies.
http://www.8pills.com
Posted by: online pharmacy | September 23, 2009 at 08:20 AM
well i take accutane and my skin has cleared up but i still have the acne marks. Anyways with makeup my skin looks almost flawless. but i ve noticed my skin is a little dull and tired looking. Tell me what you think of this products or any other lush product recomendations
* 1 year ago
Posted by: buy propecia | April 26, 2010 at 03:27 PM
Do you want information and advice on aging and health supplements with antiaging benefits like resveratrol, the miracle polyphenol found in red wine? Resveratrol research suggests it has antiaging, anti-inflammatory, anti-cancer, anti-oxidant, and cardiovascular benefits.
Posted by: Healthy Aging | April 28, 2010 at 07:27 PM
If you have water and hills nearby, pumped hydro is, by far, the best way to go.
Posted by: buy wholesale | May 10, 2010 at 07:51 AM
well.. there are good things happening in the Oil and Gas sector too. Did you know that there is a company in India that has innovated in their oil and gas drilling which led them to win an Innovation for India award by Marico Innovations Foundations!
I call that a huge turning point for this industry! They decided to explore for Oil and Gas in the east of India, where there had been no traces. If you want to read more about this, check out this slideshow.
http://www.slideshare.net/InnovationIndia/reliance-4264423
Posted by: anouchka mittal | June 16, 2010 at 09:22 AM
Thanks for the sharing of such information we will pass it on to our readers.This is a great reading.
Thanking you Nice post.
Posted by: Oil Additive | October 25, 2010 at 03:03 AM
Nice, accurate and to the point. Not everyone can provide information with proper flow. Good post. I am going to save the URL and will definitely visit again.
Keep it up!!
Posted by: B2B Marketplace | November 16, 2010 at 01:32 AM
have a learn
Posted by: tungsten | December 10, 2010 at 04:34 AM
You are one of the rare people who can post something like this.
Posted by: tucson pools | March 01, 2011 at 05:57 AM
the answer as we all know is diversify our energy sources - Exxon lose their grip on us and we get the option to shop wisely and gain more choice.. none of the major organisations are going to wade in and offer support when its gets tough..
Posted by: mikemayos | May 05, 2011 at 02:24 PM
There are alternatives available but the oil companies are not going to endorse them as long as there is oil.
Posted by: Mudding Trucks | May 11, 2011 at 11:10 AM
Tak for udveksling af sådanne oplysninger, vi vil give det videre til vores læsere.
Posted by: apotek dk | May 27, 2011 at 11:43 PM
I would like to thank you for the efforts you've made in writing this posting.
Posted by: NFL shop | June 04, 2011 at 03:03 AM
Really great post, Thank you for sharing This knowledge.Excellently written article, if only all bloggers offered the same level of content as you, the internet would be a much better place. Please keep it up!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: Travis | June 15, 2011 at 01:32 AM
Este site tem tudo tenis oakley e tambem este tenis nike estou amando.
Posted by: tenis nike shox | October 07, 2011 at 03:45 PM
Has this been the case up until now? It's almost 2012.
Posted by: Dentist West Hollywood | November 22, 2011 at 02:40 PM
I don't think they should be producing more oil, right? We don't need to be burning more, we should be putting money towards alternative sources of energy instead!
Posted by: Air Purifier | November 22, 2011 at 03:17 PM
These companies need to realize that their time is numbered, at some point they will either need to shift focus elsewhere or go out of business when the oil runs out. Hopefully they work on being better for the environment instead of draining it.
Posted by: Car Lease Broker Los Angeles | November 22, 2011 at 03:21 PM
This makes me want to sell my car and walk everywhere.
Posted by: Therapist New York | November 22, 2011 at 03:50 PM
Is this because they want to make more money, like you say higher oil prices mean more profit for oil companies...
Posted by: Rug Cleaning Los Angeles | November 22, 2011 at 04:18 PM
Are they running dry or just trying to turn a better profit?
Posted by: Underwater Video Camera | November 22, 2011 at 04:48 PM
Sounds a little like Exxon is planning on scamming us.
Posted by: Discount Furniture Santa Monica | December 01, 2011 at 07:09 PM
wow great i have read many articles about this topic and everytime i learn something new i dont think it will ever stop always new info , Thanks for all of your hard work!
Posted by: Mayes | December 23, 2011 at 03:50 PM
Wow, nice post,there are many person searching about that now they will find enough resources by your post.Thank you for sharing to us.Please one more post about that.. water
Posted by: water | January 20, 2012 at 03:26 PM