General Motors is investing in Coskata, a start-up biofuels company that says it can produce ethanol from a wide range of feedstocks for less than $1.00 per gal, compared with a wholesale selling price of more than $2.00 per gal today. GM will receive the first ethanol from Coskata’s pilot plant in the fourth quarter of 2008. Acccording to Chemical & Engineering News the first commercial-scale plant will be running in 2011, making 50 million to 100 million gal of ethanol (per year).
Coskata’s process is feedstock flexible, and enables the use of cost-effective, locally abundant materials to achieve the lowest ethanol production cost targets in the industry. This groundbreaking approach addresses many of the constraints lodged against current renewable energy options, including environmental, transportation and land use concerns.
Using patented microorganisms and transformative bioreactor designs, Their process can turn virtually any carbon-based feedstock, including biomass, municipal solid waste, bagasse and other agricultural waste into ethanol, making production a possibility in almost any geography. The three steps of the process are:
- Incoming material converted to synthesis gas (gasification)
- Fermentation of synthesis gas into ethanol (bio-fermentation)
- Separation and recovery of ethanol (separations)
During gasification, carbon-based input materials are converted into syngas using well-established gasification technologies. After the chemical bonds are broken using gasification, Coskata's proprietary microorganisms convert the resulting syngas exclusively into ethanol by consuming the carbon monoxide (CO) and hydrogen (H2) in the gas stream. Once the gas-to-liquid conversion process has occurred, the resulting ethanol is recovered from the solution using "pervaporation technology."
Coskata's proprietary microorganisms eliminate the need for costly enzymatic pretreatments, and the bio-fermentation occurs at low pressures and temperatures, reducing operational costs. In addition, the Coskata process has the potential to yield over 100 gallons of ethanol per ton of dry carbonaceous input material, reducing both operational and capital costs.
Together, Coskata's proprietary microorganisms and bioreactor designs lead to the highest conversion rates of feedstock to ethanol in the industry, as well as greater resistance to phage infections and bacterial contaminants.
As syngas fermentation leads to lower ethanol concentrations than corn fermentations, the energy and cost to separate the ethanol from water is proportionally higher. Coskata's exclusively licensed membrane separation technology dramatically improves the separations and recovery component of ethanol production, reducing the required energy by as much as 50%.
Coskata’s process technology is ethanol-specific and enzyme independent, requiring no additional chemicals or pre-treatments; environmentally superior, reducing carbon dioxide emissions by as much as 84% compared to conventional gasoline; and has the ability to generate 7.7 times as much energy as is required to produce the ethanol, compared to corn ethanol which generates approximately 1.3 times as much energy according to Argonne National Labs.
The partnership between the two companies was revealed Sunday, Jan. 13, at the North American International Auto Show in Detroit. Coskata, based in Warrenville, IL, was initially formed with funding from Advanced Technology Ventures (ATV), GreatPoint Ventures and Khosla Ventures.
This post based on materials found on Coskata's website and press releases.
Or they could make methanol from the syngas (and possibly gasoline from the methanol using Shell's well proven zeolite technology.)
Posted by: Paul F. Dietz | January 17, 2008 at 08:42 AM
The real revolution will come if they can simplify and shrink that down to the size of a washing machine that I can put in my garage and dump grass clippings and kitchen waste into, then we're talking about really living off the grid.
Posted by: Grass Man | January 17, 2008 at 10:06 AM
If this stuff is real it should spell the end of corn based ethanol.
Of course issues like waste products, and soil depletion need to be resolved. Hopefully the waste products can be put back onto the fields recycling nutrients and trace minerals.
Posted by: bigTom | January 17, 2008 at 01:08 PM
In my mind one of the big questions about the economics of this process is the performance of the gasifier. Biomass gasification has been proposed for a number of application but has proven to have high capital costs relative to alternatives. Also it has proven difficult to make the gasification yields feedstock independent.
Posted by: Roger Brown | January 19, 2008 at 11:01 AM
Roger is correct, it's not easy to gasify some biomass types, and gasifiers are expensive. High capital costs make fast adoption problematic; it comes as no surprise that the projected scale-up is slow. A drop in the bucket by 2011. That means this technology will likely be competing with cellulosic. It'll be interesting to see which one proves to be better.
A biofuel processing plant technology (and in fact, any energy technology) with very low capital costs could make a big difference I think.
What bothered me was that there is no mention of the exact yield (output/input*100%). Right here it says that it has the highest conversion rates of feedstock to ethanol in the industry. Compared to what? Corn ethanol? That's not too difficult is it now!? If it's better than cellulosic then that would be a real accomplishment. Yield is crucial as there will be a limited amount of biomass available we'd want to get the most out of it as possible.
The Coskata website mentions 100 gallons per dry ton carbonaceous. That sounds a lot better than conventional corn ethanol, perhaps similar to future cellulosic yields. But then, how many MJ's are in a "dry ton carbonaceous"? Where are the numbers?
Posted by: Cyril R. | January 21, 2008 at 07:31 AM
Or they could make methanol from the syngas (and possibly gasoline from the methanol using Shell's well proven zeolite technology.)
Paul Dietz, would that yield more than Coskata's process?
Posted by: Cyril R. | January 21, 2008 at 09:37 AM
Paul Dietz, would that yield more than Coskata's process?
I don't know, but would not be surprised if it did. The waste heat also would come out at a higher temperature, which would make it more valuable. More practically, it would involve off the shelf, proven technology, so the risk would be lower.
Posted by: Paul F. Dietz | January 21, 2008 at 01:36 PM
That's true. This source gives some figures:
Advantages of the process
• The synthetic gasoline is free of sulphur and nitrogen.
• The overall energy efficiency of the MTG process including processing energy is high, about 92-93%. The energy balance is extremely favourable, 95% of the thermal energy of the methanol feed is preserved in the hydrocarbon product. The remaining 5% is liberating as heat of reaction. However, if one includes the thermal efficiency for the methanol synthesis process from natural gas (~60%), then the overall energy efficiency (natural gas to gasoline) is about 50-60%.
• The product meets or exceeds existing gasoline specifications.
• Methanol conversion is virtually complete. Gasoline yield high.
It appears NG to methanol has a rather low yield. Biomass to methanol would probably be more like 70-80%. The Hynol process claims higher than 85% with a much lower cost target per gallon of methanol than Coskata's for a gallon of ethanol. I'm not sure how much the zeolite process would add to the cost though. Considering methanol's high octane number, it would be more efficient to use the methanol itself as a fuel. Right now making gasoline is probably best.
Possibly >80% yield of HHV? I did not think such high conversion yields would be possible, especially with gasoline as the end product and using off the shelf equipment. It looks like you may be right Paul.
Posted by: Cyril R. | January 22, 2008 at 05:17 AM
OK, so ethanol contains about 89 MJ per gallon. Coskata's 100 gallon per ton (I'll take it that's a metric) means they get about 9 GJ per metric ton of dry biomass.
The problem is the biomass. Typical dry biomass energy content would be 10-20 GJ per metric ton, which means Coskata's yield would be between 45% and 90%. That's not very informative and if they're using non-metric tons... Sigh.
Posted by: Cyril R. | January 23, 2008 at 06:35 AM
Why isn't this process being developed for producing butanol instead of ethanol? Butanol has been proven to be easier to handle (non-corrosive), and to have a BTU/gallon rating very close to gasoline.
Posted by: PatCawley | March 03, 2008 at 05:21 PM
Why isn't this process being developed for producing butanol instead of ethanol? Butanol has been proven to be easier to handle (non-corrosive), and to have a BTU/gallon rating very close to gasoline.
Posted by: PatCawley | March 03, 2008 at 05:22 PM
Today I was randomly looking over my Amazon profile, and found a list I made of products that help build fine-motor skills in babies, toddlers, and children. I wrote it in 2007 when Jake was 5 and in still in Occupational Therapy - we were really focusing at the time on his fine motor skills. I owe a lot of what I know about such things to our lovely O.T. Rachael, and to many of the books I have listed to the right.
I think a lot of people would be surprised how easy it is to start including fine-motor activities in playtime . . . especially since so many really fun things help to build those skills! Many of you are probably already doing some of these activities with your children and not realizing how great they are for development.
Posted by: sildenafil citrate | April 23, 2010 at 11:36 AM
Yes... it seems that the media is very biased to their own way of thinking and hasn't improved since you wrote this article.
Posted by: CNA Practice Test | July 28, 2010 at 02:29 AM
I have to add here in this blog that I love playing piano, is some of the things for which I die and I dedicate my life, my piano teacher has nearly 30 years in the management of this instrument, thank you for this contribution and here you leave my comment ...
Posted by: certified nursing assistant | July 29, 2010 at 02:22 AM
I THINK THIS IS A GOOD ROUTINE.....IT WILL REALLY WORK FOR ME......WHERE DID YOU GET THE PHOTO OF THIS PAGE....IT SEEMS TO BE AN ORIGINAL PAGE........
Posted by: cna license | August 04, 2010 at 04:11 AM
Lovely Post !! I am happy to read such a fantastic post The most interesting part of this blog is that "The precept of Order requiring that every part of my business should have its allotted time"
Posted by: Silver Belly Button Rings | August 04, 2010 at 07:13 AM
Good decision from GM they can earn huge profit.
Posted by: vardenafil | September 05, 2010 at 11:54 AM
that's really a fantastic post ! added to my favourite blogs list.. I have been reading your blog last couple of weeks and enjoy every bit. Thanks.
http://www.njroyallimo.com/
Posted by: vickyyouvi | October 01, 2010 at 02:49 PM
oradell limo service
Very usefull roadtrip tips… I have made some of the same mistakes they describe in the article and would have appreciated this article before I went off on my trip.
Posted by: vickyyouvi | October 01, 2010 at 02:51 PM
Awesome! Some really helpful information in there. Bookmarked. Excellent source.
Posted by: employee termination letter | October 20, 2010 at 03:52 AM
That’s good explanation, thanks for the lesson very much.
Posted by: legal forms | November 02, 2010 at 05:34 AM
its very besutiful post !i added to my favorite blogs list.. I read your blog last weeks and enjoy every much Thanks.
Posted by: newark limo | March 01, 2011 at 11:30 AM
GM's investments always turn out to be shit.
Posted by: CNA Nurse | March 29, 2011 at 06:15 PM
The blog is absolutely fantastic! Lots of great information and inspiration, both of which we all need!
Posted by: CNA Duties | April 07, 2011 at 06:15 AM
Great post! I would also recommend the book E-myth, every entrepreneur should give it a read.
Posted by: CNA Practice Test | April 07, 2011 at 06:16 AM
All these are my own opinion.I think your article is really a good topic,it may case people to think more about our society,it's good.I was agree with your opinion,I hope you can keep on your work.I will visit you frequently.
Posted by: CNA Resume Cover letter | April 20, 2011 at 03:29 AM
I have been reading your posts during my afternoon break, and I must admit the whole article has been very useful and very well written. I thought I would let you know that for some reason this blog does not display well in Internet Explorer 8. I wish Microsoft would stop changing their software. I have a question for you. Do you mind exchanging blog roll links? That would be really cool!
Posted by: CNA Cover Letter Examples | April 20, 2011 at 07:20 AM
It really is nice to definitely dig up a web site where the blogger is clever. Thanks for creating your site.
Posted by: CNA Job Description | April 28, 2011 at 02:47 AM
Nice article.....I really impressed while reading your post.....Thank you so much , it will useful to every one....
Posted by: Seo Services Company Jaipur | May 11, 2011 at 03:27 AM
Well nice post thank for being post it with all nice details by it seems that in the future would be seen other most posts
by you made. i was just thinkig to make it forward to another as just like to promote hope you would like to happen this
by me.
thanks
regards,
Aarchtours
I am owner of this site : http://www.aarchtours.com/
Posted by: Aarchtours | June 29, 2011 at 07:11 PM
I think is good choice
Posted by: ambien | August 23, 2011 at 06:10 AM
Good choice for more profit.nice post
Posted by: Kerala tours | November 03, 2011 at 09:30 AM
How great, $1/gallon is good, right? I know that I would like that to be the cost of gas at the pump!
Posted by: SEO Services | December 02, 2011 at 07:39 PM
Good stuff, is there partnership still going well?
Posted by: Air Purifier | December 02, 2011 at 08:00 PM
I am unfamiliar with Coskata, but they sound like a pretty good company with good research going on.
Posted by: dentist west hollywood | December 06, 2011 at 04:39 PM
Is this commercial plant up and running yet??
Posted by: Filipino Car Lease Broker Los Angeles | December 06, 2011 at 05:22 PM
Smart of GM to get in on this, it could be a goldmine for them.
Posted by: parking sensor system | December 06, 2011 at 05:35 PM