On November 6, 2007 Range Fuels broke ground, on what it claims is the nation’s first commercial cellulosic ethanol plant located near Soperton, Georgia. Range Fuels, one of six companies selected by the Department of Energy (DOE) for financial support in building a commercial cellulosic ethanol plant, will be the first to break ground.
The Range Fuels process accommodates a wide range of organic feedstocks of various types, sizes, and moisture contents. This flexibility eliminates commercial problems related to fluctuations in feed material quality and ensures success in the real world, far from laboratory-controlled conditions.
The first plant focuses on utilizing leftover wood residues from timber harvesting that serve no useful purpose, converting them to about 20 million gallons of ethanol and other alcohols per year, initially. By the time they ramp up to full-scale operations at the Soperton Plant, the plant is projected to produce up to 100 million gallons of ethanol each year.
The plant will employ Range Fuels’ innovative and proprietary two-step thermo-chemical process, K2:
Step 1: Solids to Gas
Biomass (all plant and plant-derived material) that cannot be used for food, such as agricultural waste, is fed into a converter. Using heat, pressure, and steam the feedstock is converted into synthesis gas (syngas), which is cleaned before entering the second step.
Step 2: Gas to Liquids
The cleaned syngas is passed over their proprietary catalyst and transformed into mixed alcohols. These alcohols are then separated and processed to maximize the yield of ethanol of a quality suitable for use in fueling vehicles.
Source: Range Fuels
It's great to see progress in the commercialisation of cellulosic ethanol. But I wonder how much energy is consumed in the process of converting the feedstock to end products?
Posted by: S Catmull | November 08, 2007 at 09:38 AM
It is a first step, but they might be better off using this process to make diesel (minimum change in catalist and reforming) this is easier to ship and higher energy density. A far better cellulosic product is 2,5 Dimethyl Furan.
Posted by: James Hughes | November 08, 2007 at 10:27 AM
Step 3: ??????
Step 4: PROFIT!! :)
Seriously, why would 2,5 Dimethyl Furan be a better product than a diesel analog? It has lower energy density.
(I'm just a layman, so I'm probably missing something)
Posted by: Ken Talton | November 08, 2007 at 06:07 PM
In my opinion, ethanol will always be a small scale part of the motor fuel solution and it is still unproven that the economics work. I believe resources are better applied to finding electrical energy and improving development of electrical vehicles.
http://www.myhomepowersystem.com/index.php
Alternative energy is an interest I have pursued and researched for years. Thank you. John
Posted by: John Cranor | November 09, 2007 at 10:39 AM
Brazil is investing a lot of money in researchs for Cellulosic Ethanol.
Posted by: Thiago Prado | April 18, 2008 at 11:51 PM