American Electric Power (NYSE: AEP) annouced that it is expanding its use of large-scale battery technology on its electricity grid by installing six megawatts of sodium sulfur (NAS®) batteries for storage of electricity to enhance reliability, allow for continued load growth, provide support for weak sub-transmission systems, avoid equipment overload and to offset intermittent wind power.
AEP will be adding stationary sodium sulfur (NAS®) battery technology in its West Virginia and Ohio service territories next year. The company will also work with wind developers to identify a third location for NAS battery deployment next year, using the storage capability to help offset the intermittent nature of wind generation.
AEP has placed an order for the three new NAS batteries with NGK Insulators Ltd. of Japan, the manufacturer and co-developer, along with the Tokyo Electric Power Co., of the technology. AEP anticipates delivery in spring 2008.
According to the New York Times:
The cost is very high, $27 million for six megawatts of capacity, or about $4,500 a kilowatt, including the price of substation improvements. Building a gas turbine of that size to meet peak needs would cost substantially less. But the battery system would be able to store power made from wind, a form of generation that does not produce any carbon dioxide. . . .
The batteries can each deliver one megawatt of power — enough to run a medium-size shopping center — for a little more than seven hours. Replenished nightly, they give back about 80 percent of the electricity put into them. Each is the size of a double-decker bus, and installation is not permanent; they can be moved to another site as the need arises.
AEP plans to add two megawatts of NAS battery capacity near Milton, W.Va., to enhance reliability and allow for continued load growth in that area. AEP will also add two megawatts of NAS battery capacity near Findlay, Ohio, to enhance reliability, provide support for weak sub-transmission systems and avoid equipment overload.
“We’re first movers on advanced storage among U.S. utilities, a position we’ve held on a wide number of technologies in our century of existence,” said Michael G. Morris, AEP´s chairman, president and chief executive officer. “Our near-term goal is to have at least 25 megawatts of NAS battery capacity in place by the end of this decade. But this is just a start. Our longer-term goal is to add another 1,000 megawatts of advanced storage technology to our system in the next decade. We will look at the full spectrum of technologies – flow batteries, pumped hydro, plug-in hybrid vehicles and various other technologies in early stages of development today – to determine their feasibility and potential for commercial application.”
"In our view, advanced storage technologies, like NAS batteries, and other emerging technologies to increase customers´ ability to benefit from energy efficiency will play equally important roles in delaying or avoiding costly future investments in new energy delivery or generation infrastructure," Morris said. “I believe other companies will begin deploying storage technologies in the coming years.”
In 2006, AEP installed the first megawatt-class NAS battery system to be used on a U.S. distribution system. That installation, on a substation near Charleston, W.Va., operated by AEP utility unit Appalachian Power, delayed the need for upgrades to the substation. A similar, but much smaller, NAS-based system installed in 2002 at an AEP office park in Gahanna, Ohio, was the first U.S. demonstration of the NAS technology.
VRB systems have a Vanadium Redox large-scale battery which they estimate costs $170 per kWh. This is a very different figure to the $4,500 per kWh quoted for this technology. Can anyone explain why this company went for a system which is far more expensive than its competitors, or else what is not appearing from these figues?
Thanks.
Posted by: Will | September 13, 2007 at 07:27 AM
The VRB cost undoubtedly is the marginal cost of adding storage capacity (basically, tanks and solutions) and does not include power-related cost (the stack that charges/discharges the system, and associated power electronics).
Posted by: Paul Dietz | September 13, 2007 at 11:16 AM
Arhhg! It's almost impossible to get decent estimates for costs. For energy storage or intermittent power, the units need to be Wh/day not peak W.
How many MWh is in this system? 4.5 hours?
That makes it $1000/kWh not $4500, and the value is in the Wh, not W, as building an inefficient peaking gas turbine doesn't include fuel costs. I calculate the price needs to come down to around $350/kWh to pay for a $.12/kWh peak cost difference.
In a 2001 presentation I found for NAS, they hope to bring costs down $1100->$630->$250->$140/kWh with mass production.
From May 2006, the NY Bus System is installing a 1MW x 7hr system
for $3.8M ($543/kWh).
This 2005 study has a table with costs/efficiency for various technologies. Flywheels seem like among the lowest cost, but I haven't heard much on this lately. The ZBB flow batteries are quoted at $400/kWh, pumped hydro at $1-2,000/kW (not kWh), compressed air at $350-$450/kW.
Hydrogen/Fuel-Cell is the worst cost-- $4-6000/Kw, and only 30-40% efficient.
I couldn't find a cost for VRB, but I seem to remember systems installed at $1000/kWh-- still high, but they can be worth it to avoid building
an extra transmission line.
Posted by: Carl Hage | September 13, 2007 at 03:20 PM
If I may be presumptuous, I will assume that they are buying a small amount of capacity from promising technologies, as part of a technology developement program. They said they wanted 1 GW of capacity, 6MW is only a small chunk of that, just the sort of scale I would expect for a technology development project.
technofossil has some important points. Too many journalists seem to have a problem distinguishing between units of power, and of energy. Energy is the time integral of power.
Now I can imagine there would be different market needs for say high-power low time sustainablity (perhaps for allowing reaction time for grid stability issues), versus smoothing out production and consumption time disparities -which presumably requires systems that deliver rated power for several hours. I would expect the later systems to cost a lot more per watt, but less per KWhr. Also how quickly the system can respond to a change in demand might vary considerably across different storage technologies.
Posted by: bigTom | September 13, 2007 at 09:34 PM
Tom, I would guess that your assumptions are wrong. My electricity comes from AEP and it is 98.2 nuke and coal. I hope it stays that way too. AEP does not operate any nukes but owns 10% of one of the best operating nukes in the US. They also run a pumped hydroelectric near where I live.
The business focus of AEP appears to be producing cheap reliable electricity with coal but there is no place in the AEP service territory that has the pollution problems of California.
For the folks who like the idea of storing energy from renewable energy, this is still good news. If AEP is doing something it is likely because it makes good business sense. For location with good wind and solar resources, AEP may be demonstrating the economics of batteries even if the energy produced is from cheap coal.
Posted by: Kit P | September 14, 2007 at 08:56 AM
Kit, there may be no place in the AEP service territory that has severe pollution problems, but the particulates from their stacks don't stay in the service territory. They wind up in my backyard, and I'm not crazy about breathing them. I'd prefer that AEP (and everyone else) replace the coal with something cleaner. Nukes would be fine with me but I'm not particular regarding the technology.
Posted by: George | September 15, 2007 at 01:00 AM
George, you sound like one of those people who live in a dirty city and want to blame it on coal plants someplace else. Your local elected representative would much rather point the finger someplace else other than at your POV and the diesel delivery trucks and buses that service your cesspool.
In other words George, if you want clean air move out of the dirty city but please show me the data that supports your conclusion that coal plants hundreds of miles away are the source of your pour air quality.
I certainly agree that nukes should be built particularity in areas that would require more railroads. It would appear that AEP plants to continue make electricity with coal and build transmission lines so George can have lots of electricity.
Posted by: Kit P | September 15, 2007 at 12:02 PM
1) George, what geographical area are you referring to, may I ask?
2) Kit P: I realize that George said 'particulate' but I remind you that CO2 from those coal plants does affect people everywhere. Or do you disagree? By the by, Kit P. what area do you call home?
Posted by: Eutopia | September 17, 2007 at 09:23 AM
For the one asking for the MWh,
the article said that it supplied 1 MW, for about 7 hours.
Wouldn't that make it a 7MWh battery?
Posted by: CoasttoCoast | September 17, 2007 at 08:18 PM
No Eutopia, I do not think CO2 'affects' people everywhere speaking as an environmental engineer. I have read are some UN and National Science Academy reports on the topic of AGW. Both of theses sources indicate that the AGW is too small to measure.
ALARA (as low as reasonable achievable) is a principle of applying engineering or management solutions to reduce the impacts of making electricity. I was very anti-coal thirty years ago. I think the coal industry in the US has reduced the environmental impact significantly. I live in the eastern edge (downwind) of AEP service territory. Now if I could convince my neighbors to burn leaves when there is a temperature inversion.
Posted by: Kit P | September 17, 2007 at 10:25 PM
Anyone know how NAS batteries are maintained at 300 degrees C?
Posted by: Glen | September 24, 2007 at 01:02 AM
The articles in this energy blog are very interesting. I love reading here and being more informed about new things. Alternate sources of energy are just the things we need. We are better off concocting new ideas that will seriously help us in during times of financial crisis. All people are benefited by blogs like this. I would like to share some the news, tips and articles here. http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/ This will help us become more aware of what is happening around us. The more knowledgeable we are, the better, wiser decisions we will make.
Posted by: Payday Loan | September 09, 2008 at 07:01 AM
These days we have to be aware of the different inventions. It helps us in our daily works and makes it more convenient and easy. In future generations a lot more will be discover and more convenient for the people. But this will be more expensive. We have to use our money wisely. We cannot avoid expenses but then using our money wisely is a big help.
Posted by: Payday Loan Advocate | September 16, 2008 at 04:39 AM
If the fossil energy is running out, the people must begin thinking about alternative energy. This has started!
hopefully better for the earth.
Posted by: hybrid car owner | June 01, 2009 at 12:26 AM
NaS is sealed in a box. a 350°C in the box is keep during they working. In my personal view, NaS is much easy to production during a flow-line. So the price will drop quick than VRB. And most important is China has start to produce them both VRB and NaS
Posted by: Phymah | April 23, 2010 at 05:54 AM
good news thanks for updating us with this
Posted by: الفيسبوك | October 10, 2010 at 12:38 PM
Nice info about Energy Revolution. energy is important and necessary part of our life and planet. this is best for energy consumer.
Posted by: komal@EPC Edgware | October 11, 2010 at 06:13 AM
American Electric Power take right step to save energy for future. this the best way for this thing.
Posted by: komal@air conditioning survey | October 26, 2010 at 01:50 AM
American Electric Power is the only battery which is not use any harmful element for give energy. this is suggested by many people those use this battery.
Posted by: komal@air conditioning survey | October 27, 2010 at 06:32 AM
Good post again.Thank you for sharing, I hope you happy and wish you good luck! this helpful information.
Posted by: B2B Marketplace | November 16, 2010 at 01:42 AM
tiffany & coスウォッチ グループ ジャパンはこのほど、東京?銀座のニコラス?G?ハイエック センター内に「ティファニー ウォッチ ショールーム」をオープンした。男性向けの「アトラス ジェント スクエア クロノグラフ」、女性向けの「ティファニー ジェメア」をはじめ、希少性の高いアイテムも展示、販売される。Tiffany Rings
国内初のティファニー ウォッチ専門店となる同ショールームには、新作ウォッチがいち早く店頭に並ぶだけでなく、さまざまなフェアやイベントも開催される予定となっている。時計の専門知識を持つスタッフにより、利用客の要望にもきめ細かく対応するという。ティファニー 激安
同ショールームでも販売される「アトラス ジェント スクエア クロノグラフ」は、最高のムーブメントとして広く認められるフレデリック?ピゲ製自動巻キャリバー1285を搭載。さらに頑丈な40mmのステンレス スティール ケースとスポーティなデザインにより、毅然とした男の魅力を演出している。Tiffany ネックレス
「ティファニー ジェメア」は、18カラットのホワイトゴールドで作られた樽型のケースが特徴で、たくさんのダイヤモンドを散りばめた宝飾時計に仕上がっている。ダイヤモンド1列のモデルとダイヤモンド2列のモデルのほかに、時計の表面に610個のダイヤモンド(3.12カラット)を敷き詰めたフルパヴェのモデルも用意。Tiffany locksこれらの3モデルを、直径22mm / 18mmの2パターンで展開する。ティファニー
その他、ショールームのオープンを記念し、日本初登場となる「ステートメント ウォッチ」「5thアヴェニュー ウォッチ」なども特別展示されるティファニー。
アメリカを代表する世界のプレミア?ジュエラー、ティファニーは1837年の創設以来、時を越えて多くの人々を魅了してきた。ティファニーのジュエリー、シルバー、ウォッチ、そのデザインの数々は何世代にもわたって世界中で愛され続けている。ティファニー 通販
Posted by: ティファニー 激安 | January 19, 2011 at 10:52 PM
RMT
Posted by: RMT | May 02, 2011 at 06:08 AM
生薬
Posted by: 生薬 | May 02, 2011 at 06:10 AM
アバクロ
Posted by: アバクロ | May 02, 2011 at 06:12 AM
AEP is providing electricity for US, and has the largest utilities, but now, how much power is left in AEP.. I'm afraid of our Mother's Nature..
Posted by: Jonas | August 06, 2011 at 03:55 AM
I certainly agree that nukes should be built particularity in areas that would require more railroads. It would appear that AEP plants to continue make electricity with coal and build transmission lines so George can have lots of electricity.
Posted by: iPhone 4 ケース | September 19, 2011 at 04:53 AM
good news thanks for updating us with this
Posted by: iPhone 4 ケース | September 26, 2011 at 09:54 PM
The business focus of AEP appears to be producing cheap reliable electricity with coal but there is no place in the AEP service territory that has the pollution problems of California.
Posted by: r4 | October 15, 2011 at 01:05 PM
Vores løsninger giver store muligheder for besparelser på jeres elregning. Hvis du vil have en indikation på, hvor stor jeres energibesparelse kan blive, så udfyld vores online beregningsskema og få et hurtigt
Posted by: Led indbygningsspot | October 25, 2011 at 08:38 AM
It would appear that AEP plants to continue make electricity with coal and build transmission lines so George can have lots of electricity
Posted by: マークバイマークジェイコブス | December 12, 2011 at 03:02 AM
West Virginia and Ohio service territories next year. The company will also work with wind developers to identify a third location for NAS battery deployment next year, using the storage capability to help offset the intermittent nature of wind generation.
Posted by: モンクレール | December 14, 2011 at 04:36 AM
d Ohio service territories next year. The company will also work with wind developers to identify a third location for NAS battery deployment next year, using the storage capability to help offset the intermittent nature of wind generatio
Posted by: アバクロ | December 14, 2011 at 04:59 AM