Biopact has a post on the merits of 'biochar' as a means of reducing carbon in the atmosphere. I had been planning a post on the subject, but they have done a good job.
New research confirms the huge and revolutionary potential of soils to reduce greenhouse gases on a large scale, increase agricultural production while at the same time delivering carbon-negative biofuels based on feedstocks that require less fertilizer and water. ...
The Australian trials of 'agrichar' or 'biochar' have doubled and, in one case, tripled crop growth when applied at the rate of 10 tonnes per hectare. The technique of storing agrichar in soils is now seen as a potential saviour to restore fertility to depleted or nutrient-poor soils (especially in the tropics), and as a revolutionary technique to mitigate climate change. ...
Agrichar is a black carbon byproduct of a process called pyrolysis, which involves heating biomass without oxygen to generate renewable energy. Pyrolysis of biomass results in the production of bio-oil, that can be further refined into liquid biofuels for transport (earlier post, on Dynamotive's trials). When the agrichar is consequently sequestered into soils, the biofuels become carbon-negative - that is, they take more carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere than they release. This way, they can clean up our past emissions. ... read more
Tyler has a good post in Clean Break and a longer article in the Toronto Star on the subject, while Cornell University has a Bio-char site for those of you interested in more reading.
This sounds too good to be true. What is the downside here?
Posted by: eric | June 02, 2007 at 10:07 AM
Another group working on the same technology:
Eprida
http://www.eprida.com
Posted by: mapson4 | June 02, 2007 at 01:56 PM
Carbon is good for plants? I was told that it was killing the planEt? Silly rabit, tricks are for Gore.
Posted by: Tim | June 02, 2007 at 02:38 PM
Well, it certainly isn't perfect.
However as is, most fertlizer comes from natural gas being turned into ammonia.
(CH4 into NH3)
Merely replacing the fossil fuel fertilizer should have it's benefits.
Not to mention it cuts down some 40% on the decomposition of the fertilizer, reducing the ammount of methane and N2O it releases.
_
That said, thats assuming biochar for food crops.
Biochar for fuel crops might not be so beneficial.
Posted by: GreyFlcn | June 02, 2007 at 03:03 PM
But to produce char from fossil fuels such as coal and petroleum, in order to sequester the carbon, will require massive amounts of energy.
My guess is that 80% of the energy of fossil fuels comes from the carbon component producing CO2, while only 20% comes from the hydrogen component.
So in order to sequester the carbon, we have to reduce the efficiency of coal and petroleum combustion by 80%.
Therefore, this is DOA as a method of sequestration. However, as an alternative to fertilizer it does make sense. But I am sure it is not as good a fertilizer, and will degrade the soil after its concentration increases. So you need to find more farms and forests with low-char content and after a while you will run out of land. IOW, this is not sustainable.
I still think the best solution is nuke plus nLiFePO4 batteries and electric vehicles, and ethanol/plastics produced from nukes and biomass carbon. I am told vitrification of nuke waste will be safe for at least 1000 years, and then at that time, we can just dump it into the sun.
Posted by: Beek | June 02, 2007 at 05:11 PM
Beek, char is made from wood.
Posted by: Ronald Brak | June 02, 2007 at 09:50 PM
To be available to most plants, most soil nutrients have to be in a water-soluble form. But if they are water soluble, then they can be leached out of the soil, or perhaps already have been leached out of the soil. Char consists of very small, high surface area particles that can bind nutrients, and hold them in the soil despite leaching, hence may very well be interest in promoting the fertility of depleted tropical and sandy soils. More of the nutrients added to high surface area soils, whether by nature or art, stick around long enough to actually be useful to plant growth.
Posted by: Cyrus | June 03, 2007 at 01:21 PM
As for sustainability, though it's not mentioned in the article, there are anthropogenic soils in the Amazon that are notably black, as opposed to the yellow of the surrounding tropical clay. The present understanding of these soils is that native villagers produced them by amendments of charcoal, and lived on them for a few centuries. One European expedition encountered this network of villages in the mid 1500s. Subsequent explorers found nothing; presumably the culture abandoned its sites amidst the epidemics, warfare, and general disuprtion of the period.
Posted by: Cyrus | June 03, 2007 at 01:29 PM
The Engineer Poet, At the Ergosphere Blog posted a piece called, worth the wait on Nov. 22, 2006. All of the original thinkers who have come up with the. " I've got a great idea" should take another glance through this post. The man has many other sound and practical solutions that would help this country achieve a shot at oil for energy independence.
J.C., Sr.
Posted by: J.C., Sr. | June 03, 2007 at 01:50 PM
A company in North America , w2energy , is proposing using fossil fuels in a similar way to biochar . The fossil fuels can be used to produce hydrogen fuel and then the remaing carbon is decomposed into a humic acid type soil conditioner . As a result it would increase plant growth and reduce CO2 levels . Carbon negative fossil fuel !!
Posted by: Dan | September 16, 2007 at 10:25 AM
I agree, I think the best solution is nuke plus nLiFePO4 batteries and electric vehicles, and ethanol/plastics produced from nukes and biomass carbon.
Keith
Posted by: forklift equipment manufacturer | March 25, 2010 at 09:48 AM
“The Biochar Revolution” with “The Biochar Solution”
http://biochar-books.com/
The Biochar Revolution collects the results and best practical advice that these entrepreneurs have to offer to the biochar community. When practice and theory advance to the point where they meet in the middle, then we will truly see a biochar revolution.
Posted by: greenpower | December 28, 2010 at 10:20 AM
I heard about biochar a few months ago from a friend of mine. I never thought that something as simple as charcoal could do so much for the soil and the environment.
I was amazed after reading "The Biochar Revolution" from http://biochar-books.com/The_Biochar_Revolution.
Check it out. It was a great help in opening my mind to issues that affect us all.
Posted by: landboy09 | January 28, 2011 at 06:48 PM