U.K.-based coal producer and power generator Powerfuel PLC, which is 30% owned by Russian coal miner Kuzbassrazrezugol, has signed an agreement with
Construction will take three to four years and may involve building a pipeline to transport carbon dioxide to storage sites in the North Sea.
From the Shell press release:
The UK unit of oil giant Shell has signed a license agreement with Powerfuel that entitles the company to use Shell’s proprietary gasification technology in its proposed 900MW integrated gasification combined cycle coal-fired power station in Hatfield, South Yorkshire.
According to Shell UK, the purpose of this approach is to enable carbon capture and storage to take place at the lowest cost using current technology. The partnership could see Powerfuel become the first commercial-scale coal-fired power generator with carbon capture in the world.
Shell commented that coal gasification is the cleanest method for converting coal’s energy potential into electricity. The process takes coal and turns it into a hydrogen-rich synthesis gas, which, in this case, will facilitate the separation of the carbon dioxide prior to combustion in the turbine generators.
"will facilitate the separation of the carbon dioxide prior to combustion in the turbine generators"
WOW this is a major breakthrough. Seperation of Co2 BEFORE it is created. What will those Shell guys come up with next
Posted by: Bruce Long | April 22, 2007 at 12:21 AM
"separation of the carbon dioxide prior to combustion" sounds weird, but it's not an error.
http://www.gepower.com/prod_serv/products/gas_turbines_cc/en/igcc/benefits.htm
"In IGCC plants, carbon can be removed from the syngas before combustion to create a high-hydrogen fuel, effectively eliminating carbon dioxide emissions."
Aside for CO2, other pollutants like NOx, PM, and heavy metals are easier to remove before IGCC combustion than from flue gas after conventional combustion.
Posted by: John F. | April 22, 2007 at 10:49 AM
URL was truncated. The last part should be benefits.htm (click here).
Posted by: John F. | April 22, 2007 at 10:55 AM
Knew that the water gas shift was used to create the best balance of CO and H gases from gasification. Never crossed my mind that it would be best used to completely eliminate and seperate the CO side - would have assumed extra economics of seperating out CO2 from H2 would have made it a futile effort.
Posted by: Jezz | April 22, 2007 at 12:23 PM
CO2 and H2S are both captured in amine scrubbers. Separating them costs money; it is relatively easy to co-sequester them if e.g. deep-well disposal is available.
Posted by: Engineer-Poet | April 22, 2007 at 01:33 PM
How is the carbon dioxide to be stored in the North Sea?
Posted by: Robert Hargraves | April 23, 2007 at 12:05 PM
"How is the carbon dioxide to be stored in the North Sea?"
down an oil well, where it will stimulate production.
Posted by: George Bruce | April 23, 2007 at 12:46 PM
"Powerfuel PLC...has signed an agreement with Royal Dutch Shell PLC to use Shell's patented technology to build a near-zero carbon emissions coal-fired power station."
How do we find out what "near-zero" means, both in terms of reduction and actual amounts of CO2? The same question also pertains to NOx and other pollutants. What is the magnitude of the benefits proposed here?
Posted by: Eric | April 25, 2007 at 02:34 AM
"Near Zero" means they produce around as much CO2 as a normal coal fired power station - they're just pumping it under the north sea, to replace the big holes where north sea oil is being pumped out.
The only way to find out exactly how much CO2 will be released is to ask the designers just how far they're taking the water gas shift.
CO + H2O = CO2 + H2 and all that crap.
OK, I don't know much about this but as a equilibria type reaction, they probably won't take it above 96%(guessing) right hand side and combust the rest of the CO with the H2.
Compared to normal coal fired, coal gasification to CC turbines is plugged as producing none at all - probably talking about reduction ratio 1:1000ish up in SOx and NOx- Again, don't take my word on it.
The whole 'clean coal' concept has been around for ages, just no one has built them because theres too much uncertainty over the overall effectiveness of the entire system (LCA).
Just Thought - This is probably being built on the back of UK politics from last season, rather than for any breakthrough; (not that u lot in US will give a crap about it but);
1) ALL - and I mean ALL - the UK nuclear stations are reaching there sell by date. We built what - 3, 4? nuclear stations since the 1970's?
2)Blair has had to ORDER his researchers to consider nuclear power in recent reports, because all his underlings told him last year that we don't need nuclear - that there are enough significant alternatives
3)Last winter (or was it 05-06?), at peak demand , every single UK station was running at full. If a single station has to shut down, there would have been a power shortage - partly due to nuclear and coal stations that have been decommisioned.
4)There is STILL no long term system set up for disposing of UK nuclear waste - at least not as much as we produce. Eventually they will stick it underground - or sell it to Norway....
Overall I reckon a lot of people working for the government are probably pushing hard to get some new stations up to prove a point about nuclear - too many people in Wales are dead against it cus there're the fuckers that got blow back from chernobyl.
I mean it was only a couple of sheep FFS....
Posted by: Jezz | April 25, 2007 at 05:32 PM
If we can use the word clean with solar and wind, I do not see why the coal industry can use it based on looking at LCA based on marketing.
The point of LCA is to actually read them so you can mitigate the environmental impact of the choice you pick. I do not have problem with solar in the desert or wind in the middle of a monocrop. I can understand why these folks do not think wind is better than coal.
http://www.wvmcre.org/index.htm
Posted by: Kit P | April 25, 2007 at 07:00 PM
Yeah can't see people letting those get built out there back garden,
Offshore only for that kindo size,
Posted by: Jezz | April 26, 2007 at 06:17 AM
Way off shore.
Posted by: Kit P | April 26, 2007 at 06:27 PM
As engineer poet points out.
Instead of creating elaborate scrubbers, and seperators, drilling underneath the bottom of the ocean, and hauling CO2 down there.
Perhaps a simpler solution would be just to switch to BioCoal, which doesn't contain any of the mercury, sulfur, heavy metals, and carcinogens.
Charred biomass maintains roughly 90% of it's original energy content, without all the nasty smoke causing bits.
Performance-wise it's just as good as Coal.
_
And ultimately it's also the fuel-of-choice for Direct Carbon Fuel Cells, due to it's regularized structure and lack of impurities.
And Direct Carbon Fuel Cells can process BioCoal at 80% effeciency. (Way above the 35% for normal coal power plant, or 55% for IGCC)
And it doesn't even need water to operate.
_
The other cool part is that for the pollutants you do need to worry about i.e. PM and NOx
Those can easily be "scrubbed" by algae, and turned into MORE biomass. Which can then be dried, then charred, by cogenerated heat.
_
Would be dirt cheap compared to IGCC with CCS, and Nuclear.
Posted by: GreyFlcn | April 26, 2007 at 10:00 PM
Oh wow, simple and cheap. Look like a good business opportunity for GreyFlcn and E-P.
Posted by: kit p | April 26, 2007 at 10:43 PM
If outfits like Direct Carbon Energy didn't already have the rights sewn up, I might have made a go for it.
Posted by: Engineer-Poet | April 26, 2007 at 11:47 PM
丰胸
Posted by: 丰胸 | May 18, 2010 at 03:33 AM
丰胸
Posted by: 丰胸 | May 18, 2010 at 03:34 AM
丰胸
Posted by: 丰胸 | May 18, 2010 at 03:35 AM
丰胸
Posted by: 丰胸 | May 18, 2010 at 03:38 AM
tiffany & coスウォッチ グループ ジャパンはこのほど、東京?銀座のニコラス?G?ハイエック センター内に「ティファニー ウォッチ ショールーム」をオープンした。男性向けの「アトラス ジェント スクエア クロノグラフ」、女性向けの「ティファニー ジェメア」をはじめ、希少性の高いアイテムも展示、販売される。Tiffany Rings
国内初のティファニー ウォッチ専門店となる同ショールームには、新作ウォッチがいち早く店頭に並ぶだけでなく、さまざまなフェアやイベントも開催される予定となっている。時計の専門知識を持つスタッフにより、利用客の要望にもきめ細かく対応するという。ティファニー 激安
同ショールームでも販売される「アトラス ジェント スクエア クロノグラフ」は、最高のムーブメントとして広く認められるフレデリック?ピゲ製自動巻キャリバー1285を搭載。さらに頑丈な40mmのステンレス スティール ケースとスポーティなデザインにより、毅然とした男の魅力を演出している。Tiffany ネックレス
「ティファニー ジェメア」は、18カラットのホワイトゴールドで作られた樽型のケースが特徴で、たくさんのダイヤモンドを散りばめた宝飾時計に仕上がっている。ダイヤモンド1列のモデルとダイヤモンド2列のモデルのほかに、時計の表面に610個のダイヤモンド(3.12カラット)を敷き詰めたフルパヴェのモデルも用意。Tiffany locksこれらの3モデルを、直径22mm / 18mmの2パターンで展開する。ティファニー
その他、ショールームのオープンを記念し、日本初登場となる「ステートメント ウォッチ」「5thアヴェニュー ウォッチ」なども特別展示されるティファニー。
アメリカを代表する世界のプレミア?ジュエラー、ティファニーは1837年の創設以来、時を越えて多くの人々を魅了してきた。ティファニーのジュエリー、シルバー、ウォッチ、そのデザインの数々は何世代にもわたって世界中で愛され続けている。ティファニー 通販
Posted by: ティファニー 激安 | January 20, 2011 at 12:44 AM
awesome idea build a near-zero carbon emissions coal-fired power station. awesome.
please explain how is the process to do this???
Posted by: American Attorneys | April 03, 2011 at 03:50 PM
生薬
Posted by: 生薬 | May 03, 2011 at 04:45 AM
アバクロ
Posted by: アバクロ | May 03, 2011 at 04:50 AM
RMT
Posted by: RMT | May 03, 2011 at 05:04 AM
I hope that they aren't using nuclear power. because what happened on Japan, it is making people dislike that kind of energy.
Posted by: xl pharmacy | November 01, 2011 at 12:44 PM
The UK unit of oil giant Shell has signed a license agreement with Powerfuel that entitles the company to use Shell’s proprietary gasification technology in its proposed 900MW integrated gasification combined cycle coal-fired power station in Hatfield, South Yorkshire.
Posted by: モンクレール | December 14, 2011 at 04:40 AM
K unit of oil giant Shell has signed a license agreement with Powerfuel that entitles the company to use Shell’s proprietary gasification technology in its proposed 900MW integrated gasification combi
Posted by: アバクロ | December 14, 2011 at 05:07 AM