Australia to Change Lightbulbs to Curb Warming
Reuters via Planet Ark, February 21, 2007
Australia will be the world's first country to ban incandescent lightbulbs in a bid to curb Greenhouse gas emissions, with the government saying on Tuesday they would be phased out within three years.
Environment Minister Malcolm Turnbull said yellow incandescent bulbs, which have been in use virtually unchanged for 125 years, would be replaced by more efficient compact fluorescent bulbs by 2009.
As I understand it the low energy bulbs don't work with variable brightness control. What happens to all these fixtures in households already? Am I mistaken?
Posted by: marcus | February 21, 2007 at 12:30 AM
LED lights dim quite well unlike CFL's. In a couple of years the price on them will come down.
Posted by: mike teachman | February 21, 2007 at 01:16 AM
There's a few types of CFL that work quite well with dimmers around now too.
My problem is that some people much prefer incandescent light... I reckon that instead of banning them they should be taxed 1000% higher or so...
Posted by: Isaac | February 21, 2007 at 02:35 AM
First let me say I have put compact fluorescent lamps in those places where the lights are on a lot.
But it would be really silly to do this for a number of other places in my house. For example, the (incandescent)light in my attic is on for maybe two hours per year. There is a part of my basement where I go every week, but the (incandescent)lights are on for only a minute or so each time. The original bulbs (31 years old) are still there. Even the ceiling light in my master bedroom is a marginal candidate - it took 20 years before I had to change the (incandescent) light bulb there.
Seems to me that putting compact fluorescent lamps in those locations would be a mistake. The electronic ballast in the lamp would probably fail (electrolytic capacitors dry out) long before the fluorescent tube would wear out.
I am sure the manufacture of a CF lamp is more energy intensive than an incandescent light bulb. If I have to replace CF lamps due to old age, I may actually be using more energy than if I had used incandescent lamps in the first place.
My solution: Tax incandescent light bulbs so that the initial cost is a bit higher than compact fluorescents. There are a lot of people who see only that initial cost, and don't understand the ongoing cost.
Posted by: donb | February 21, 2007 at 10:02 AM
donb regarding "Seems to me that putting compact fluorescent lamps in those locations would be a mistake."
Now don you are trying to bring reason, common sense and logic into the argument. This just doesn't fit with emotional environmental politics. :) JohnBo
Posted by: JohnBo | February 21, 2007 at 12:35 PM
Just in the interests of completely unbiased information - is there an actual drawback to using compact flourescents? Seems to me I saw a comment on some blog somewhere suggesting they're not as bright, and cost more. Don't get me wrong, I'm all in favor (and maybe this post simply shows that *I'm* not as bright) but I'm just curious.
Posted by: Janis Mara | February 21, 2007 at 02:41 PM
Janis-
I don't what web site to send you to for more info, so I will relate my personal observations:
1. Yes, compact fluorescent lamps do cost more, but they are getting cheaper all the time. I bought some multi-packs at Costco, and I think it came out to about $1.50 per bulb. This is getting to within spitting distance of incandescents. Since they (usually) last much longer than incandescents, the per-hour cost of the bulb is quite a bit cheaper (as is the energy cost).
2. When I first put in compact fluorescents, I noticed they were not as bright as the incandecents they replaced, even though they claimed to be a replacement of equal brightness. So I got out a photographic light meter, and the meter confirmed what my eyes were telling me. My rule of thumb now is to use the "next wattage up", that is, if I am replacing a 60 watt incandescent light bulb, I used a compact fluorescent that claims to replace a 75 watt incandescent light bulb. This satisfies both my eyes and the light meter.
Note that compact fluorescents ARE dimmer when first turned on. They need to warm up a bit to get to full brightness. I find this to be an advantage when I first go to the kitchen early in the morning before my eyes are fully awake.
Posted by: donb | February 21, 2007 at 03:48 PM
when you first go to the kitchen in the morning you should be relying on natural light, rather than wasting precious energy resources
Posted by: Douglas | February 21, 2007 at 04:31 PM
Aside from cost, CFLs get dimmer with time and do not last long in fixtures that trap heat.
Posted by: Kit P. | February 21, 2007 at 09:25 PM
I've replaced incandescents everywhere I can with CFLs, and personally, I don't find them less bright. As someone said, most of them cannot be dimmed. But the biggest drawback for me is that they can't be put on electronic timers or electronic controls, such as photoelectric switches. I tried it once anyway, despite the warnings on the package, and after some days the base turned black and nearly caught fire.
Posted by: Randal | February 21, 2007 at 11:04 PM
Douglas-
I don't know about where you live, but here in Spokane, WA., when I wake up and go to the kitchen at 4:15 AM, there is no natural light to be had this time of year.
Posted by: donb | February 22, 2007 at 09:52 AM
There are a few applications where CF bulbs simply won't work, like for an oven light! Banning incandescents is not a good solution, there are better ways of encouraging energy savings.
As for use with electronic timers and photo-eye switches, get the right type of switch. I was shopping for photo-eye switches, and noticed that the cheap ones were for incandescent lights only, but the better ones will also work with fluorescent and sodium vapor and metal arc lights!
Posted by: CM | March 01, 2007 at 08:51 PM
It isnt about the $$ you are going to save this week or this month or even this year. Its about the lack of energy that you use and with an entire country using less, The "oil rich nations" wont get the $$ they need to bring the rest of the world to their knees....
Posted by: Chuck | March 13, 2007 at 07:10 PM
My eyes are extremely sensitive to light, and any type of fluorescent light, including CFL's used in homes and offices, strains my eyes when reading anything black printed on white paper. At times my eyes will simply start tearing up because of the brightness. This is a huge issue for me. At work, our overhead hanging light fixtures each use 1 CFL bulb. As a graphic designer my job depends on looking at the computer screen all day with a discerning eye. So with the CFL bulbs turned on, my eyes strain very quickly. I am forced to turn off the light altogether, and rely on daylight. I am all for saving energy however banning incandescent light bulbs is not the solution!
Posted by: clarie | March 21, 2007 at 05:47 PM
Alaska’s governor, and the Republican candidate for Vice President of the United States, has been a media darling lately. However, it is as more of a punching bag than a champion, in spite of the facts. Last weekend, she appeared on Saturday Night Live after being spoofed by the program. Instead of being praised for being a good sport, she was singled out for it. She has become a frequent target for criticism, for her performance as Alaska’s governor, her character, even for intrusion into her family life when it became known that her 17 year old daughter had become pregnant. This amounts to little more than character assassination. Palin has been praised by many in her home state for her efforts to improve Alaska, and her tireless support for the disabled, by working for the needs of people afflicted with Down’s syndrome, autism, and other disorders who haven’t received the care that they need and deserve. She also is a staunch advocate of personal responsibility and financial freedom. She also has advocated for not ridding the US of cash advances, a legitimate industry that working, responsible, normal people that need a helping hand in a financial crunch use who don’t want to have to or can't turn to the banks or credit card companies.
Post Courtesy of Personal Money Store
Professional Blogging Team
Feed Back: 1-866-641-3406
Home: http://personalmoneystore.com/NoFaxPaydayLoans.html
Blog: http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/
Posted by: Payday Loan Advocate | October 24, 2008 at 02:41 AM
Great read, and thank you for raising the subject.
Posted by: Business Electricity | May 25, 2011 at 11:32 PM
I am always impressed with how health and earth contentious that Australia is. I have also heard that they band plastic for any food products. I feel that they are a great leader in those departments. I wish that the FDA would take a lesson from them.
Posted by: Online Furniture Stores | December 08, 2011 at 04:10 PM
I am glad to hear that... Now when is America and everyone else going to take some responsibility too?
Posted by: Dentist Los Angeles | December 08, 2011 at 06:01 PM