Methane hydrate--nicknamed "burning ice"--has recently been attracting much attention. With the aim of lowering the cost of transporting natural gas from small and midsize gas fields in Southeast Asia, the Japanese government has set a policy to start commercially transporting natural gas in solid form by 2008, government sources said Wednesday. Natural gas hydrate (NGH) is an icelike material produced artificially by combining natural gas and water under high pressure at moderately cold temperatures.
As transporting natural gas in solid form is much cheaper than moving liquefied natural gas, the government expects to employ the method at numerous small gas fields located in Southeast Asia, many of which are currently unexploited.
NGH stabilizes as a solid at around minus 20 C and can be transported more easily in this form.
Liquefied natural gas needs large-scale plants to cope with the ultralow temperatures involved in liquefying natural gas, which is occurs at minus 162 C.
The government will propose the creation of an international safety standard for transporting the solidified natural gas--NGH--at a safety meeting of the International Maritime Organization, being held in Turkey until Friday.
The plan will significantly help Japan compete for energy resources with China, India and other emerging economies, which are desperately seeking to secure natural gas supplies.
Source: The Yomiuri Shimbun via Peak Oil News & Message boards
If this much more efficient transport technology is used to harvest gas that would otherwise escape into the atmosphere, it actually helps reverse global climate change.
A lot of natural gas is just released into the air now or burned because it is too far from consumers. In addition some method of collecting gas from under permafrost and from ocean floor methane hydrate might be developed. That would prevent gas escaping as melting is ocurring.
Posted by: amazingdrx | December 08, 2006 at 01:49 AM
amazingdrx,
Do you know that methane atmospheric concentration has been stabilizing for more then 10 years (and nobody knows why nor has predicted it!).
Posted by: Demesure | December 09, 2006 at 12:02 PM
Hadn't heard that Dem. Any link to that data?
It does not match up with the extra release from melting permafrost and ocean floor methane hydrate ice deposits. Or the extra release from chemical agriculture and fertlizer and manure runnoff.
Posted by: amazingdrx | December 09, 2006 at 12:37 PM
One thing that affects atmospheric methane is the level of atmospheric oxidants, such as hydroxyl radicals or chlorine radicals. The higher the levels of these radicals in the troposphere, the more quickly methane is oxidized and removed.
OH gets consumed by carbon monoxide, so reducing emissions of that gas would free up oxidants to destroy methane, mimicing a reduction in the emission of that gas. Perhaps this is what's been happening.
Posted by: Paul Dietz | December 13, 2006 at 02:42 PM
I wonder if you used seawater to make the hydrate, the ice would be free of salt. If so, desalination would be a nice secondary product.
Posted by: Paul Dietz | December 13, 2006 at 02:45 PM
Paul-Something I know quite a bit about in that I spent many a year working on freeze desalination. Although I did not work with hydrates, I knew several people who did. There is no doubt that the hydrate would be free of salt. Whether it had any inclusions of salt, the shape of the crystals and the size of the crystals all determine whether the salt water adhering to the crystals could be washed off. It is easily washed off from water ice if the crystals are above ~0.2 mm. The people working on hydrates, usually of butane or isobutane, generally had smaller crystals that were hard to wash. The retention time to make large hydrate crystals was to long to be econommical. Since the methane hydrates sit on the ocean floor for a very long time there is a possibility they would grow by the phenomena called regelation. Making the crystals and washing are the most difficult parts of the process, so at least half is done by nature with methane. The processes were to mechanically complex for a commodity as cheap as water and R&D was generally abandoned when Reverse Osmosis became economical. Having the crystals already made would reduce the complexity. Since seperation of the methane and the water is a necessary part of the methane recovery it probably would not be a big deal. But there were problems with removing the butane from the water down to the levels required for potable water.
Posted by: Jim from The Energy Blog | December 14, 2006 at 12:08 AM