According to an article on the IOL, South Africa website, scientist Professor Vivan Alberts and his colleagues at the University of Johannesburg (formerly Rand Afrikaans University) have achieved a breakthrough in developing a "revolutionary, new highly efficient solar power technology" after 10 years of research. Panels will be available within a year. The technology has been patented throughout the world. It is claimed to be "much more efficient than the costly old silicon solar panels."
The article goes on to say:
A German company IFE Solar Systems, has invested more than R500-million (US $83-million) in the South African invention and is set to manufacture 500,000 of the panels before the end of the year at a new plant in Germany. Production will start next month and the factory will run 24 hours a day, producing more than 1,000 panels a day to meet expected demand. ....
The South African solar panels consist of a thin layer of a unique metal alloy that converts light into energy. The photo-responsive alloy can operate on virtually all flexible surfaces, which means it could in future find a host of other applications.
Alberts said the new panels are approximately five microns thick (a human hair is 20 microns thick) while the older silicon panels are 350 microns thick. the cost of the South African technology is a fraction of the less effective silicone solar panels.
According to this November 2004 article:
Prof Vivian Alberts of the Department of Physics at the Rand Afrikaans University in South Africa and team have developed and patented a novel manufacturing technique that finally makes it possible to construct CIGS solar panels at a very low cost. ....Work done over the last two years indicates that panels can be produced in commercial volumes at a cost of about R 500 (US $83 or $1.66/W) for a 50 Watt panel. This is much cheaper than existing solar panels available on the market.
$1.66/W is much lower than anyone else is achieving right now but, if you believe their price, they could be on about the same pace as some other non-silicon thin film producers will be in a year, so I don't see their technology as "revolutionary." Their installed price might be about $3.00-$3.50/W (at 2x panel price). The key to low cost cells is the manufacturing methods and it is awful ambitious of anyone to assume they can reach that price in one year, even with a "novel" manufacturing process.
Daystar and others are developing similar technology. Daystar may be reaching $3.00-$3.50/W installed price in 2007 with their Gen II production if everything goes right. They are achieving 20% efficiency in the laboratory which is much better than anyone most get with silicon. Daystar plans on reducing its installed price to the range of $1.00/W when its Gen III production is tuned up in 2009, but I suspect they may have to go to a Gen IV process, producing wider width cell panels and a higher production rate before they reach that price.
NREL has said that industry needs to get its price down to about $0.52 per watt (cost $0.26) to achieve installed price of under a $1.00/W, (for 13% efficiency CIGS panels) the holy grail of pricing necessary to compete with utility power without any subsidies in the US. Electricity is much more expensive in South Africa than in the US, so maybe their price is competitive over there. Prices this low are for large multi-MW installations, not for household installations, so that is another factor to consider. Supplies of Indium and Gallium become tight when you are talking about multi-GW production so yet another obstacle to overcome. And then could we have patent infringement lawsuits at some time? Life is so complicated.
Technorati tags: solar, PV solar, solar power, energy, technology
I believe SunPower is achieving greater than 20% efficiency in practice, and significantly more in the laboratory.
Posted by: radicimo | February 21, 2006 at 02:08 AM
A reader sent me this link to the South African edition of Popular Mechanics which gives more background on the South African project. He also pointed out that Professor Vivian Alberts is a he, not a she, and I changed that reference in the first line of the post.
Yes SunPower silicon cells have an efficiency of 20-21% and their panels have an efficiency of 17%. I don't know anything about their pricing, they are ramping up production and producing in the Philipines which should bring their prices down, but they are still dependent on using silicon.
Posted by: Jim from The Energy Blog | February 21, 2006 at 08:11 AM
Anyone know how Prof Alberts CIGS technology is any different from Daystar Tech's CIGS?
Posted by: Halvo | February 21, 2006 at 08:43 AM
"Prices this low are for large multi-MW installations, not for household installations, so that is another factor to consider."
Yes, you but also ought to consider that household installations have to compete against retail electricity rates, not wholesale rates like large multi-MW central PV stations do. Retail rates are about 7-8 cents/kWh while wholesale rates are more like 5 cents/kWh so you hit a competitive price for household installations far before you hit it for industrial-scale installations.
In my opinion, the strength of PVs lies in their ability to be deployed in a distributed fashion. Why try to go for central plants when you can simply put them on rooftops. There's an awful lot of wasted rooftop space out there in urban areas. Why go ahead and install these central plants elsewhere? Even desert's support ecosystems that ought to be preserved if we have the option to install PVs in existing urban areas instead.
Posted by: JesseJenkins | February 21, 2006 at 06:51 PM
Jessie you are right in that retail electric rates are much higher than the wholesale rates, but it isn't that simple. Simplifing the case to one where the unit capital costs were the same we have a large difference in how the capital costs are treated. Since there is no fuel cost and minimal O&M costs, the only significant factor is the installed cost. The utility will amortize the cost over a long period, usually 20 years, while very few homeowners are willing to do that. They want a electrical source that will pay for itself in cost savings in 5 years, a few will consider 10 years. Ignoring interest that would double or quadruple the cost of electricity for the homeowner. In fact the homeowner may have to pay 30 to 50% more for the installed panel because of the large discounts a utility can get and the lower cost of installation the utility gets because of the scale of its installations. My back of the envelope calculation says that with a 7.5% carrying charge for the utility, a 30% higher capital cost for the homeowner with a 5 year payback results in the homeowner having about 3 times the cost of electricity as the utility has. To me that would be attractive for quite a few homeowners, so I claim that makes the required panel cost about the same for the two cases. I would be glad if anyone wants to make a more exact analysis to disprove or validate my analysis.
Posted by: Jim from The Energy Blog | February 21, 2006 at 10:22 PM
Jim, there are two key elements here: financing, and building integration.
Financing: If a homeowner can finance a PV with their mortgage, then we're talking 30 year amortization (whether it's a 30 year fixed mortgage or an ARM, it's likely to have 30 amortization). An installation with a net cost of $10,000 financed with a 6.5% mortgage would have a monthly cost of $63. If it saves them more than that in electricity, then the decision is easy.
Building Integration (BIPV): if the PV is part of the roof (rather than a panel plopped on top of it), then you get a two-for-one, as it provides the roof function as well as power. This also greatly reduces the cost of installation, as you would have roof installation cost in any case.
This works best for new construction, of course, but it can work for roof replacements as well. I would argue that this can make the cost of homeowner/commercial building installation lower than that for utilities. Add in the difference between wholesale and retail rates, and I would argue that decentralized installation is the logical direction to pursue for PV.
Posted by: Nick | February 22, 2006 at 12:22 PM
Watch out for technologies that require solar tracking (E.g. any technology based on concentrating the light).
Unless you are willing to rotate the whole house, or maybe just the roof ;-), building integration is not an option with these types. They do not work will in cloudy weather either, as opposed standard PVs that produce power from diffuse sunlight as well.
This is where buildings, such as malls, with large flat roofs have a distinct advantage.
That said, the type mentioned in this post seems to be of the "standard" flat plate PV design.
Here in Denmark, retail prices of electricity are around 25-30 cents (US $) per kWh. Legislation is on the way that will let you sell excess power and only pay for the total power balance from the grid. (If you sell 3000 kWh and buy 5000 kWh, you would pay for 2000 kWh. Your savings would be $ 5-600).
-Thomas
Posted by: Thomas | February 23, 2006 at 08:43 AM
We are Zimbabwean company in alternative power solutions. We are looking for a suplier of solar panels that will make it possible for urban and rural houses to become completely self-sufficient for energy supplies.
The panels should be able to generate enough energy to run stoves, geysers, lights, TVs, fridges, computers - in short all the mod-cons of the modern house.
Posted by: Workman | March 01, 2006 at 05:28 AM
we should consider the tax incentives and the latitude of the location as well in calculating break eve costs
Posted by: ranbir sahni | March 07, 2006 at 04:34 PM
I am delighted to have stumbled across this blog because the South African solar energy breakthrough could make all the difference in the world! I've just been looking to find out if it really is feasible.
So far I haven't found any reason to believe it isn't, but I'm also not quite ready to invest several million dollars for rights and a manufacturing plant.
After reading the posts above, I realized that by the time we actually have these available, the price of energy could have doubled or more. Or we may be facing blackouts or at least brownouts.
CIGSSe could allow those of us who want off the grid to get off it. We also want to charge up our hybrid cars from solar power.
Considering the potential for electricity and/or oil disruptions has never been greater, the exact costs may be less important than getting the units manufactured and installed before peak oil proceeds too far in the down direction.
Believe me, here in Arizona we need reasonably priced solar power very much, indeed. Of course, who doesn't?
Also, we may not have the time to wait until some other more perfect solar product is developed. Some of us feel that whatever we manage to do now is a little late for a start, but now is better than never.
Posted by: Patrick Hickey | March 13, 2006 at 12:09 PM
BETSAM ENGINEERING SERVICES COMPANY
12, Idowu Lane, Off Kodesho,
Ikeja Lagos.
Phone: 234-1-7226999, 234-8023172852
Fax: 234-1-2557255
Mail: [email protected]
Web: www.betsam.com
Dear Sir,
This is to formally introduce our company- "BETSAM ENGINEERING SERVICES" to you. We are indigenous organization established to provide Electrical and Electronics services in all areas including installation, maintenance and training of computer-based systems. We are engineering company base in Lagos Nigeria.
In view of the erratic power supply by the Nigerian Electricity supply to most corporate and private sectors, we find it more interesting and economic viable to learn more and start installation Solar Energy for both Private and Public sectors.
We then search for a very reliable company on the Internet, that how we got your contacts from, to see how we can work together, as our technical support and also if we can act as your sales outlet here in Nigeria.
We have highly trained Electrical and Electronics Engineers in our company and a highly equipped workshop with modern facilities to meet with internation standards, in our Fast growing market and highly capital base economy. We are interested in your services and sales of all your products. Please find it as a way of expanding your market force by contacting One of the leading marketing companies in Nigeria to promote your Products and services outside the sure of your country Please kindly contact us by mail or phone for further discussions on Your products, we will be expecting a quick response to our letter in Due time.
Please find it free to call or mail us as this will encourage us to put more resources together for this new project. Nigerians needs to generate more energy for them self's since the main Energy generation is not effective.
We also believe that it will open new markets for you and expand your distribution outlets outside your country.
BETSAM ENGINEERING SERVICES will be pleased to provide further information on our products and services when need arises. As we continue to strive to ensure that our customers get the best services, we commit our efficiency to your ability to provide best products.
We thank you for giving us this opportunity and look forward to working with you in this new project drive.
Yours faithfully,
Eng. Femi Awobusuyi
For: Betsam Engineering Services
Posted by: femi awobusuyi | April 03, 2006 at 09:24 AM
Sounds interesting, but what is the life expectency of the product? It could cost 50 cents a watt, but if it only lasts 5 years what good is the technology when compared to silicon ?
Posted by: Ray Boggs | April 06, 2006 at 12:45 PM
Have a look at the article on this website: Some technical extracts from the Patent by Prof. Vivian Alberts:
http://www.b100.co.za/
Page link http://www.b100.co.za/vivianalberts.html
Regards
Sarel
Posted by: Sarel Wagner | July 03, 2006 at 08:20 AM
at 50 cents over 18 to 20 years gives incentive does the cost come down per watt. when the cost per kilowatt is 35 cents or more or less to be competative more so evironmentally neutral,unlike others fossil fission
Posted by: alan ward | August 27, 2006 at 08:33 PM
APPARENTLY IFE HAS RIGHTS OVER THE TECHNOLOGY A GERMAN COMPANY AND IS BUILDING A PLANTS TO START PRODUCTION IN MID 2007 IT SHOULD BE FINISHED AND THAT THE PANELS WILL BE BLACK IN COLOR AND THAT IT WILL TAKE 20% MARKET SHARE AND THAT THEY ARE 16% EFFICIENT,THAT ITS UP TO THIS COMPANY TO DESTRIBUTE MARKET SHARE AS THEY OWN THE RIGHTS,TO DO AS THEY PLEASE IN THIS THIN FILM TECHNOLOGY,THIS IS WHEN THE WORLD WILL HAVE ONE WORKING SOLUTION SOLAR ONE MORE CHEAP ENOUGH VERSION TO DO AS PREDICTED.AND THE BLACK COLOUR WOULD BE IDEAL ON THE OUT SIDE OF A AIR VERHICAL AS IT WOULD NOT BE TO SHINNY AND COULD MAKE IT PERPETUAL WITH A EFFIENT NICKLE ALLOY BATTERY TO BE SELF CHARGING RUN AT 80 KM PER HOUR FOR 2000,MILES WITH PERAL RECHARGE ELECTRITY WOULD HAVE TO BE SELF RECHARGING OTHER WISE A POWER POITN NOT QUITE YOUR HYBRIDE BUT GOOD ENOUGH FOR GETTING ARROUND ANY WHERE NOT QUITE A FARRARAE WONT RELACE EVERYTHING MILITARALY COMBUSTION BUT GOOD ENOUGH TO RUN WITH OUT PETROL OR FOSSIL FUEL .
Posted by: alan ward | September 07, 2006 at 01:48 AM
these air cars are grid cars and self made electical micro,system and can be made cheap 14,000 australian dollars unlike other hybrides for the poor man of countries like Australia AND FAST HYDRIDES WILL SOLVE SOLUTION WORLD WITH SOLAR PANELS THIS EFFICIENT AT 16% CAN BE DONE,BEFORE TO LATE A COUNTRY LIKE NEW ZEALAND COULD SET A EXAMPLE
Posted by: alan ward | September 07, 2006 at 02:15 AM
these air cars are grid cars and self made electical micro,system and can be made cheap 14,000 australian dollars unlike other hybrides for the poor man of countries like Australia AND FAST HYDRIDES WILL SOLVE SOLUTION WORLD WITH SOLAR PANELS THIS EFFICIENT AT 16% CAN BE DONE,BEFORE TO LATE A COUNTRY LIKE NEW ZEALAND COULD SET A EXAMPLE
Posted by: alan ward | September 07, 2006 at 02:17 AM
the carbon tree to make emissions into a neutral state can be done by making hydrocarbons from carbon gas NEW SCIENTIST MAGAZINE. the carbon tree sequastion1000*DISCOVERER MAGAZINE by a single scientist doing research and doctor sorrels hydrogen tile titanium cataylist nsw university australia a spectrum device photo measuring device materials makes hydogen from any water source AND BACK TO WATER EVEN POLLUTED CAN MAKE A CARBON TREE CHEAP ENOUGH AND MAKE FUELS MATERIALS WHEN AND SAVE PLANET AND ALSO 70PERCENT SOLAR NITRATES COMBINED SPECTRUM ALAYSIS PHOTO MATERIALS AND QUANTUM DOTS MATERIALS TOO AND AUSTRALIAN REASURCH 30 * MORE SOLAR PANELS SHOULD FIND A SOLUTION AND BORON OR HYDROGEN BORON FUSION FOCUS FUSION SHOULD FIND A WAY FROM 7,000,000 TO A 60 MILLION IN 10 YEARS TO 120 IN 20 YEARS MUCH CHEAPER THAN CARBON SOLUTIONS THESE ARE REALVENT TO THE SOLAR SOUTH AFRICAN PANELS IN THAT THEY ARE SOLUTIONS AND COMPETITORS IN THE HIGHER RANGE AS THESE ARE 16 PERCENT EFFICIENT AND RUN AS CHEAP AND 24 VOLT SYSTEMS CAN BE BUILT FROM THESE A MANY TERE SYSTEM OF SOLUTIONS THAT MAKE MONEY.THE SCIETNTIST SHOULD WORK TOGETHER AS THEY ARE PHTO CATAYLIST DEVIVES AND TITANIA DEVICES RESPECTIVELY TO THE FOSIL FROM CARBON AND HYDROGEN TOO.
Posted by: alan ward | September 17, 2006 at 07:54 PM
these are solutions that could be cheap enough and power ful enough to do the job,and scare the bi jesus out of the fosil fuel industry in effiency and cost all though and make a lot of money to keep going although fusion alternatives have always been just around the corner the hydrogen boron recent reasearch will open up the direction needed for fusion how to and the toroid fusion project 8000,000,000 could run air craft and the military toriod weapon in 10 they are 80% percent likely to work and the first results will be here in 3 years hydrogen boron plasma focus but the solar solutions will find alest one as mentioned by me to set up the world and the cost will be mimmal one the cost of a traffic light the nitrate 70% in its spectrum and be a full spectrum device with full effiency others.
Posted by: alan ward | October 04, 2006 at 08:19 PM
algae can complete carbon cycle under ground and be converted to ethanol and feed sunlight by optic fibre,to illiminate space problems compltetely using a power stations carbon dioxide compltely.
Posted by: alan ward | October 05, 2006 at 11:50 PM
cost toriod fusion eight million not eight billion.
Posted by: alan ward | October 05, 2006 at 11:52 PM
effanol is neutral in emmisions and electrical verhicals can do the distance and milage and speed required to be combustion competitive and is the cleanest as othr fuels with out panels or internalized source terra form,earth with out not completing cycles.
Posted by: alan ward | October 06, 2006 at 12:00 AM
negating military fossil and strategic demography,and completely recycling it,and re kinda like refuel it,and place monies around else where.
Posted by: alan ward | October 06, 2006 at 12:02 AM
unclouded demography effiects clouds of conaminates
Posted by: alan ward | October 06, 2006 at 12:04 AM
nitrides and some other materials mixed solar material can hit the theoritical maxium of spectrum why dont they research this70%andwhy do eletric cars not be made with there maxium speed and mile large and be rechargable of road as a verhical it could compete with conbustibles and be effienct too this is atlest as good as hydrogen although new south wales hydrogen tile will produce enough and catalist titanium,to make the hydrogen needed and to catalise the carbon process too to oil and alge can do the same and land should be brought for this from coal oil stacks also the carbon tree calcinates the carbon from the air 1000* effective if it works and is cheap enough other solar materials in the high end can do 65% spectrum where as the material south african does 16% they are quantum dot materials why dont they get more monies about 7,000,000 each will get results,as combustibles are of road technologies for the military,thus they must have a civilion excuse fossil fuel too.
Posted by: alan ward | October 23, 2006 at 07:49 PM
What is the best way to approach holders of technology for a manufacturing license and/or JV to produce solar grade silicon? A number of technologies are there, it seems carbothermic and electrolytic process are going to be there for sometime.
Posted by: walid nassar | December 12, 2006 at 11:55 AM
Why is everyone going so big? Surely is is possible to ensure very low cost lighting using pv panels and LEDs?
We are a non profit company, using orphaned wild animals to educate children in the environment and also provide extra lessons in maths, english and science.
We were recenty donated some solar garden lamps. One was broken by accident, and in repairing it we came up with this idea:
Dissect the garden lamp by removing the solar pv panel and extending the connection with twin flex. Mount the panel on the roof of your house. Run the flex back to the unit and re-connect. Remove the stand (which throws a shadow). Locate the photo sentive switch, remove it, and replace it with a "pull string" switch. Mount the unit on the highest point of the roof, ensuring you can reach the "pull string" of the switch.
It doesn't give much light, but certainly sufficient to see where you are going at night! Dirt cheap! Perhaps someone can give me a supplier of pv plate in South Africa, LEDs, pull string switches etc...all the components and then the children can make them here, and maybe even sell them?
Posted by: Ian Merrifield | March 24, 2007 at 05:24 AM
We are a company in Botswana wishing to do business in alternative power solutions. We are looking for a suplier of solar panels that will make it possible for urban and rural houses to become completely self-sufficient for energy supplies.
The panels should be able to generate enough energy to run stoves, geysers, lights, TVs, fridges, computers - in short all the mod-cons of the modern house.
Posted by: Banks Ndebele | May 08, 2007 at 09:31 AM
We are Zimbabwean company in alternative power solutions. We are looking for a suplier of solar panels that will make it possible for urban and rural houses to become completely self-sufficient for energy supplies.
The panels should be able to generate enough energy to run stoves, geysers, lights, TVs, fridges, computers - in short all the mod-cons of the modern house.
Posted by: Banks Ndebele | May 08, 2007 at 09:32 AM
We are Zimbabwean company in alternative power solutions. We are looking for a suplier of solar panels that will make it possible for urban and rural houses to become completely self-sufficient for energy supplies.
The panels should be able to generate enough energy to run stoves, geysers, lights, TVs, fridges, computers - in short all the mod-cons of the modern house.
Posted by: Banks Ndebele | May 08, 2007 at 09:34 AM
Please could you give us a litte info. We are an electrical company and have just got a job for a complex in the lowveld, Mpumalanga. They require the houses to run on 220 volt as well as 12 volt solar. Plus a generator. We are not very involved with the solar side but this produt could be the product need. We also need to run as many things as posible as they are trying to get the houses to be self saficient. Could you please give us som advice as wll as an average cost.
Many thanks
Brent
Posted by: Brent Cornish | November 10, 2007 at 08:03 AM
Need a reliable manufacturer out there who will want to partner with our organization to start production of PV cells or 'paints' in south western part of Nigeria.
Our study reveals a great potential.
Posted by: Debo Oladele | May 23, 2008 at 07:16 AM
Need a reliable manufacturer out there who will want to partner with our organization to start production of PV cells or 'paints' in south western part of Nigeria.
Our study reveals a great potential.
Posted by: Debo Oladele | May 23, 2008 at 07:23 AM
Debo: Should I just give you my account number or do you want me to wire you the money? Maybe even better, I put my money in a bag and leave it at the front door for you.
Posted by: Nigerian Scam? | May 23, 2008 at 05:07 PM
I RUN AN ENERGY COSULTING AND MARKETING FIRM, IN NIGERIA, AT THIS STAGE OF PHOTOVOLTAIC DEVELOPTMENT, EMPHASES SHOULD BE BASED ON RELIABILITY, PERFORMANCE, AND EFFICIENCY.
I WOULD ONLY MARKET THE SILICON SOLAR PANELS FOR NOW, EVEN THOUGH I COMMEND THE EFFORT OF MY SOUTH AFRICAN BROTHERS,, "AS THE SAYING TESTED IS TRUSTED"
Posted by: denis oluremi john-jolaosho | June 30, 2008 at 12:43 AM
Debo: Please let us have more information about your project. Thanks for early reply!
Posted by: Afolayan Emmanuel | December 15, 2009 at 10:01 AM
ITS REALLY NICE POSTING...........
Bathmate
Posted by: bath mate | December 27, 2009 at 04:04 PM
South Africa contains some of the oldest archaeological sites in the world.Extensive fossil remains at the Sterkfontein, Kromdraai and Makapansgat caves suggest that various australopithecines existed in South Africa from about three million years ago.
These were succeeded by various species of Homo, including Homo habilis, Homo erectus and modern humans, Homo sapiens.
Settlements of Bantu-speaking peoples, who were iron-using agriculturists and herdsmen, were already present south of the Limpopo River by the fourth or fifth century CE. (see Bantu expansion). They displaced, conquered and absorbed the original Khoisan speakers. The Bantu slowly moved south. The earliest ironworks in modern-day KwaZulu-Natal Province are believed to date from around 1050. The southernmost group was the Xhosa people, whose language incorporates certain linguistic traits from the earlier KhoiSan people. The Xhhosa reached the Great Fish River, in today's Eastern Cape Province. As they migrated, these larger Iron Age populations displaced or assimilated earlier peoples, who often had hunter-gatherer societies.
In 1487, the Portuguese explorer Bartolomeu Dias became the first European to reach the southernmost point of Africa. Initially named the Cape of Storms, The King of Portugal, John II, renamed it the Cabo da Boa Esperança or Cape of Good Hope, as it led to the riches of India. Dias' great feat of navigation was later immortalised in Camões' epic Portuguese poem, The Lusiads (1572). In 1652, Jan van Riebeeck established a refreshment station at the Cape of Good Hope on behalf of the Dutch East India Company. The Dutch transported slaves from Indonesia, Madagascar, and India as labour for the colonists in Cape Town. As they expanded east, the Dutch settlers met the south-westerly expanding Xhosa people in the region of the Fish River. A series of wars, called the Cape Frontier Wars, ensued, mainly caused by conflicting land and livestock interests.
Posted by: viagra online | January 05, 2010 at 05:18 PM
Very good blog! Thanks!
Posted by: viagra kaufen | January 20, 2010 at 08:34 AM
Interesting blog, the author thanks so much for the interesting explanation!
Keep it up, great success! Bloggy wish a lot of good posts!
Posted by: payday loan | January 31, 2010 at 03:51 AM
The author thanks a lot! Many well written blog!
Posted by: Vigaplus | February 20, 2010 at 01:06 AM
Thanks for the very descriptive article, and I will in return bookmark it. I am always on the lookout for the best tools that are available on the market.
Posted by: kennedy tool boxes | September 28, 2010 at 02:22 PM
SOLAR ENERGY – I DID IT ALL ALON AND SUCCSEDED! This is my personal experience and I want to share it with you all
In times of unstable financial situation, a wind turbine and a solar panel can help us save money on energy consumption and also keep the environment pollution free.
We can actually save up to 80% of the energy consumption.
This free energy can be easily generated from natural resources. There is no need to invest on any other commercially made home power generator – you have the option to actually build one yourself. Fewer units are needed to transform these resources to free energy. To create a solar and wind turbine at home you can use junk or parts that are readily available in local stores. As we have the ability to generate free energy from natural resources, so why pay the electric company for energy consumption? Learn to build a homemade power generator, such as solar panels and wind turbines on a tight budget by following the instructions that shows you how to do that with detailed, step by step. You shouldn't depend entirely on the information downloaded for free on Internet, because if you make one mistake - the whole project may be ruined. I used a great guide and it was easy – now I have panels on my roof and free electricity!! I suggest you follow the instructions carefully as they are written by professional ecologists, who guide you with certainty. The program includes simple step-by-step instructions guide, all of which can be easily followed by anyone. The kit contains the procedure to find all the necessary parts and put them together. All this can be done for less than $ 200 rather than trade is one that cost less than $ 1000
Go to my web site and read what I have to say: http://free-energy4u.com
Posted by: Rina Friedman | October 04, 2010 at 11:00 AM