Solar towers use many large, computer controlled, sun tracking mirrors (heliostats) to focus the suns energy on a receiver located at the top of a tower. A heat transfer fluid, usually molten nitrate salt, is heated in the receiver and used either to drive a turbine/generator to produce electricity or to provide high temperature thermal heat. The molten salt can be used to store the thermal energy for producing electricity at night or during cloudy weather. Commercial power plants would be sized from 50 MW to 200 MW each.
A ten MW plant, Solar One, located near Barstow CA operated for six years demonstrating the viability of solar towers. It used a heat transfer fluid to transfer the heat to the generator. Solar Two, shown left, was a retrofit of solar one, built to demonstrate the advantages of molten salt for heat transfer and solar storage. At one point it delivered power to the grid for seven days, 24 hours a day during cloudy weather. Molten salt solar towers are well suited to peaking power applications, being able to generate power when most needed, day or night, cloudy or sunny.
In a molten-salt power tower, the molten nitrate salt, which is a clear liquid with properties like water at temperatures above its 240oC (464oF) melting point, is pumped from a large storage tank to the receiver, where it is heated in tubes to temperatures of 565oC (1049oF). The salt is then returned to a second large storage tank, where it remains until needed by the utility for power generation. At that time, the salt is pumped through a steam generator to produce the steam to power a conventional, high-efficiency steam turbine to produce electricity. The salt at 285oC (545oF) then returns to the first storage tank to be used in the cycle again.
The following paragraphs were excerpted from the Solar Power Tower report referenced at the end of this post.
The Solar Two receiver is comprised of a series of panels (each made of 32 thin-walled, stainless steel tubes) through which the molten salt flows in a serpentine path. The external surfaces of the tubes are coated with a black Pyromark™ paint that is robust, resistant to high temperatures and thermal cycling, and absorbs 95% of the incident sunlight. The receiver design has been optimized to absorb a maximum amount of solar energy while reducing the heat losses due to convection and radiation. The design, which includes laser-welding, sophisticated tube-nozzle-header connections, a tube clip design that facilitates tube expansion and contraction, and non-contact flux measurement devices, allows the receiver to rapidly change temperature without being damaged. For example, during a cloud passage, the receiver can safely change from 290 to 570ºC (554 to 1,058ºF) in less than one minute.
The salt storage medium is a mixture of 60 percent sodium nitrate and 40 percent potassium nitrate. Molten salt can be difficult to handle because it has a low viscosity (similar to water) and it wets metal surfaces extremely well. Accordingly, Solar Two is designed with a minimum number of gasketed flanges and most instrument transducers, valves, and fittings are welded in place.
Reference:
Technology Characterization - Solar Power Tower (pdf 304 KB), SolarPACES
Technocrati tags: solar, thermal solar, renewable, alternative energy
published reports on steam generation and heat recovery. all available. more news to soon.
Posted by: brian donnelly | January 07, 2006 at 12:29 AM
Posted by: nitinPanchal | August 23, 2007 at 12:49 AM
Is it possible to get detail design/ design features of steam generating heat exchangers
of Solar one and solar two.
alternate ID: [email protected]
Posted by: Anant Joshi | August 31, 2007 at 04:59 AM
Solar 2 cost $48.5M in 1996 and produced 10MW, and was later decommissioned and converted to a telescope.
Why was it decomissioned, why are they not springing up all over the world, and why are they being sold in South Africa by the 100MW with claims of $1M per MW cost?
Posted by: Martin Glass | October 31, 2007 at 06:40 AM
MG
There was a time when only a few nuclear power plants bragged about performance and production cost. The interesting thing about good performing plants is that they had great safety records too. Now every plant is performing better than the top quantile 10 years ago.
Now the debate is about plants lasting 80 years and how fast we can build new plants.
When the solar industry starts discussing performance instead of potential, we can then debate the roll of solar power. The short answer to MG's question, solar does not work. Great for cool pictures.
Posted by: Kit P | October 31, 2007 at 08:06 AM
Solar stand alone PV works, where the cost to run grid to a site needing power exceeds or is close to the cost of a PV system to supply the energy required, or where the OPEX costs of running a diesel power plant exceed the CAPEX finance costs of a PV plant.
Outside of this, I agree, makes for great pictures, and one of the greatest ways to be seen to be green.
Posted by: Martin Glass | December 28, 2007 at 02:42 AM
i think much year ago but i cant tried i seen hear you done first
Posted by: subhash narang | March 22, 2008 at 01:50 AM
this is a great site i go here for everything for science
Posted by: Ray Garris-Shoemaker | May 01, 2008 at 04:08 PM
Like I said,
“``Natural variations over the next 10 years might be heading in the cold direction,'' Wood said. ``If you run the model long enough, eventually global warming will win.''
The world will become at least 2.5 degrees Celsius warmer by 2100, compared with the pre-industrial period, Rajendra Pachauri, chairman of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, said in March.”
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aU.evtnk6DPo&refer=worldwide
I want to the AGW zealots call these folks denialist. What is not know and will never be know is the magnitude and environmental impact of the human portion. What is very well established is the benefit of an adequate energy supply.
Posted by: Kit P | May 01, 2008 at 08:57 PM
Just because there are uncertainties KitP does not make it any less of a problem. Since we know how much CO2 we are contributing to the atmosphere we can estimate the temperature change due to our efforts. Read the latest IPCC report.
Posted by: Marcus | May 01, 2008 at 09:41 PM
“less of a problem”
Marcus provides an example of negative thinking. Mathematical “uncertainties” does not make the something more of a problem either.
Drunk drivers not wearing seat belts have a lower risk of getting alcohol cancer than I do because they will more likely to die in an accident before they develop cancer.
AGW zealots like Marcus are afraid of gradual change in climate something the planet has always adapted for. If life on earth can adapt between summer and winter, then “ 2.5 degrees Celsius warmer by 2100” should not be too hard. Marcus please stop telling me to read something when you ignore the results. If AGW is a crisis, then the word 'crisis' has lost it is meaning.
Posted by: Kit P | May 02, 2008 at 09:40 AM
"The world will become at least 2.5 degrees Celsius warmer by 2100"
Very safe predictions to make - like maybe the sky will turn green by 2100. If you're wrong, who cares, you'll be long gone and so will those who heard the prediction.
The earth is in equilibrium, whatever the doomsayers who make fortunes out of our fears would have us believe.
The ocean warms up, so Antarctica, Iceland and The Artic dump huge ice cubes into it, and the ocean cools down.
"Natural variations over the next 10 years might be heading in the cold direction"
Now here is a short-term prediction that the writer will probably be around to defend in 10 years time - because it is most likely based on evidence, rather than fearmongering speculation.
And all of these negative theories presuppose that there is no God, who loves us and created everything around us for our benefit. But then trusting God wouldn't be good for business, would it?
I'm not saying we shouldn't act responsibly with our environment, but if the planet heating up is our fear, consider that it will cool down soon enough once there are no more fossil fuels to burn. But perhaps not in our lifetimes - while we are alive, in the eyeblink of a lifetime when compared with eternity, our concern should not be of things which we cannot change, but of things we can.
Things within ourselves.
Posted by: Martiin | May 09, 2008 at 01:26 AM
well the salt which is used is to generate power.is it possible to use any other salt which is low cost and can be used for steam generation purpose.please reply.
email id:[email protected]
Posted by: Pankaj | May 30, 2008 at 01:10 AM
if i have a boiler which is working 24 hrs and i need to minimize its use,is their some process where i can use molten salt to convert water to steam along with the boiler...???please reply.
email id:[email protected]
Posted by: Pankaj | May 30, 2008 at 01:17 AM
We are interested in build the tower one in Korea. Small scale for experiment. Anyone interested to involved, please let me know. We provide you lodging while you stay in Korea.
Posted by: hanul chung | August 01, 2008 at 09:26 AM
Kit P...
You state about reading the IPCC report...Try reading the first chapter of IPCC ar4 WG1...
It says that they dismissed data due to the inability to model thus data...
Is that not creating a false result in itself?
For a theory to have credence, it must be complete and without fault..
Another issue is the drop in Temperatures in the last 6 months, kind of goes against the theory..
And another issue, temperature rises and increase in CO2.. This has been going on for more than 400,000 years(They have gone that far back with ice core sampling), humans dont have that much power yet.. CO2 is made up of two distinct types, Manmade and natural.. Carbon 12/13 and carbon 13/12..
Which is which?
How much of CO2 is manmade and how much is natural?
Solar activity is critical to this planet, yet IPCC havent taken it fully into consideration, thats a bit questionable in it self...
How much have the seas risen, strange answer from IPCC, yet the datum they took data from shows a drop of 34 cm, but hey they are the experts(isnt that a drip under pressure?)
But of course, you need to fudge results to scare people into supporting your oxygen tax and pay for things that are not needed...
Dont be an alarmist, become a solutionist!...
We are polluting our planet, but its not what people are looking at, thats just an excuse to get you looking away from what the real problems are...
Posted by: Kath aka wraithe | August 03, 2008 at 02:05 PM
a prototype Solar chimney in TÜRKEY. it's capacity 1,5 KW. diemensions; height: 15m, collector diameter:16m, chimney diameter:1,2m
for more info...
http://www.unienerji.com
http://www.unienerji.com
http://www.unienerji.com
Posted by: expert | October 30, 2008 at 05:43 PM
Solar energy in TÜRKEY
Türkey has remarkable solar energy potential. But we can't use our this potential. in last five years, we have been applied some solar applications. you can find some special applications in http://www.unienerji.com , http://yekarum.sdu.edu.tr
Türkey has bigger potential than germany but germany has used solar energy more than us. I think, it's main reason is less promoting the development of solar energy in türkey than germany.
Posted by: expert | October 30, 2008 at 05:45 PM
I am currently a student at Vanderbilt University, and I am doing a research project on SolarReserve's solar thermal technology. My team has several questions that we were wondering if we could get answers to:
1)What are the plans of the government regulation and how will this affect production?
2) Spain has implemented several regulations supporting solar thermal technology: Law 54/1997 and Spanish Royal Decree 436 (http://www.solarpaces.org/News/Projects/Spain.htm ). Do you think regulation such as this is necessary in the United States?
3) What are the effects of the bailout bill have on government regulation?
4) How does solar thermal energy relate in terms of cost and reliability with other promising alternative energies?
5) How long is the stored salt 99% efficient (clarify what this means)?
6) How feasible is it that the cost can come down enough to compete with coal?
7) Are the foreign companies (SENER) planning to build plants in the United States/ how will this affect the market?
8) How much does upkeep of a plant cost… ie heliostat replacement, loss of salt?
Thank you very much - any information is helpful!
Posted by: student | December 08, 2008 at 03:31 AM
Vanderbilt?
This is a hoax, right? A student prank maybe. Or is it the Barstow regional campus of Vanderbilt.
Maybe it is a political science class studying the politics of the loony left.
“1)What are the plans of the government regulation and how will this affect production?”
Where, which government? I lived and worked in Spain for a year. While I love the people and the country, they are having trouble picking a government that is somewhere between fascist and socialist.
“Do you think regulation such as this is necessary in the United States?”
Do you mean like the RPS enacted in Texas under then Governor Bush or the PTC under now President Bush? The answer is yes but we already have them Since renewable energy has higher capital costs incentives need to be provided to get investors to build something other than natural gas fired power plants.
“3) What are the effects of the bailout bill have on government regulation?”
Huh! What regulations? Building power plants requires long term investments. DOE provides loan guarantees for low carbon investments. Those regulation are already established but I would think you still need investors with capital.
“4) How does solar thermal energy relate in terms of cost and reliability with other promising alternative energies?”
Mature renewable energy like hydroelectric, biomass, geothermal provide about 10% of US electricity because they work and the power plants last a long time. Promising is code for not mature. Wind can produce electricity cheaper than natural gas so it is a good combination for when the there is no wind. When wind turbines last a long time then it will be a mature industry.
Solar thermal beats PV. Solar thermal with hear storage is essentially the same steam cycle as a nuclear plant. A nuke plant can store the energy for a 24 months of electricity for a large city.
“5) How long is the stored salt 99% efficient (clarify what this means)?”
Steam power plants do not like thermal cycling. To fully utilize the high cost capital equipment of a solar steam plant energy must be stored or other wise provided usually with natural gas. One way to store thermal energy is is by heating water. Think of your hot water heater. If you put a 100 BTUs of energy into your hot water heater and lost 1 BTU to an unheated space, it would be 99% efficient. Another way to store energy would be “a 16-hour molten-salt storage system” where the time length of time the steam plant could keep running without the sun. The efficiency would not change with time.
Before moving on, picture 400 solar thermal plants for each large coal or nuclear plants assuming every day is sunny.
“6) How feasible is it that the cost can come down enough to compete with coal?”
Where? Just east of Gillette Wyoming on I-90 is a strip mine and coal power plant. You can use Google Earth to look at this plant and compare it to those existing solar plants near Barstow California.
An unprepared student from Vanderbilt University could likely die traveling Gillette Wyoming in winter or Barstow California in summer. Cost is not the issue.
I do not think that solar thermal will ever be an economical competitor with coal. Location matters more than cost and surviving the elements in more important than cost.
Part of doing research is learning where to find the information. A good place to look is the California state web page on energy. All project must have an EIS and other regulatory reviews.
Posted by: Kit P | December 08, 2008 at 10:00 AM
Thanks for this useful blog. You have given a clear explanation about Solar Towers.
To know about solar energy visit http://www.solarenergy-solarpower.com.
Solar Energy - Solar Power site is providing all the information
and products you need to start your own solar power project.
Posted by: Renewable Electricity | April 09, 2009 at 08:41 AM
Thanks you for your wonderful explanation about the function of solar Towers.
Posted by: Solar Power Installation | April 17, 2009 at 02:18 AM
nil
Posted by: P.Subba Raju | June 13, 2009 at 02:45 AM
I'm working on a green house project. I'm really interested by this Solar towers and I really would like to know if it's reliable for single housing application.
thanks a lot!
Husky air compressor
Husky air compressor tools
Posted by: husky air compressor | July 10, 2010 at 08:52 AM
Modern technology is this solar system now. Cars, factories every electrical device is being connected to solar power system to save energy and utilize God's natural products. As its cost has been discusses, its high in some places because this system has not yet been adopted by many countries yet due top lack of knowledge and information.
Posted by: Wholesale Suppliers | October 14, 2010 at 01:12 AM
That's great that you think in this way there's many times that people get boring reading a book.
Posted by: Petrochemicals | October 18, 2010 at 03:17 AM
Hi Hanul
I am interested in helping to build a small scale solar thermal plant.
This may be way to late but let me know.
I have just completed all my modules for my Masters degree in Advanced energy and environmental studies, I did however postpone my thesis because I can't make up my mind for a topic.
Let me know
Lee Todman
Posted by: Lee Todman | November 04, 2010 at 12:43 AM
Solar Energy is the most easily available and free source of energy. It is the most important out of non-conventional sources of energy too, it is non polluting, available for all and convenient source therefore helps in lessening the greenhouse effect.
Posted by: solar power hot water heaters | December 14, 2010 at 02:00 AM
thank you. i love to read this type of information posts. again thank you....
Posted by: kiralık devremülkler | March 17, 2011 at 03:22 PM
It is a nice article. It is a good information about solar towers. The solar tower works like a huge inverted funnel. Solar tower also can produce electrical generation in large scale quantities.
Posted by: gps fleet tracking system | March 22, 2011 at 02:06 PM
Solar towers are a good alternative for scarce energy resources.
Posted by: used car loan | April 01, 2011 at 01:53 AM
I think that this post is very good, i would like to read more information about this topic.
Posted by: Invertir en oro | May 17, 2011 at 02:29 PM
thank you. i love to read this type of information posts. again thank you....
Posted by: アニメ抱き枕 | June 20, 2011 at 02:31 AM
thank you. i love to read this type of information posts. again thank you....
Posted by: フィンペシア通販 | August 07, 2011 at 05:19 PM
thank you. i love to read this type of information posts. again thank you....
http://plusyu.info フィンペシアの効果~通販で人気の発毛剤の効果は
http://funvalue.info フィンペシアの徹底調査~人気の発毛剤その理由は!
http://hregrow.info ロゲインの効果は~ロゲインの口コミ評判を調べてみます。
http://atryks.info ミノキシジルタブレットの通販~ミノタブの効果と副作用
http://plusus.info 育毛剤はお得な医薬品で!~発毛剤ミノキシジルの種類と価格を調査
Posted by: フィンペシア通販 | August 08, 2011 at 03:23 PM
プロペシア通販は個人輸入代行をりようします。
Posted by: プロペシアの効果 | August 18, 2011 at 02:08 PM
1フィンペシア通販はこちらが安心です。
Posted by: フィンペシア通販 | August 19, 2011 at 11:53 AM
2フィンペシア通販はこちらが安心です。
Posted by: フィンペシア通販 | August 20, 2011 at 04:12 AM
3フィンペシア通販はこちらが安心です。
Posted by: フィンペシア通販 | August 20, 2011 at 04:12 AM
4フィンペシア通販はこちらが安心です。
Posted by: フィンペシア通販 | August 20, 2011 at 04:13 AM
5フィンペシア通販はこちらが安心です。フィンペシア通販はこちらが安心です。
Posted by: フィンペシア通販 | August 20, 2011 at 04:22 AM
6フィンペシア通販はこちらが安心です。
Posted by: フィンペシア通販 | August 20, 2011 at 04:22 AM
フィンペシア通販
フィンペシア通販
フィンペシア通販
フィンペシア通販
フィンペシア口コミ評判
フィンペシア通販
フィンペシアの効果
フィンペシアとプロペシアの徹底比較
プロペシア通販
プロペシア効果
Posted by: フィンペシア通販 | August 20, 2011 at 04:50 AM
プロペシア通販
ロゲイン通販業者比較
ミノキシジルタブレット通販
フィンペシア通販
フィンペシア
プロペシア
カークランド通販
Posted by: フィンペシア通販 | August 20, 2011 at 05:23 AM
ロゲイン通販
カークランドの通販
フィンペシア
ロゲインの口コミ評判
ミノキシジルタブレット通販
ミノキシジル
フィンペシア価格
Posted by: フィンペシア通販 | August 20, 2011 at 05:25 AM
ミノキシジルタブレット通販
フィンペシア通販
フィンペシア
プロペシア
カークランド通販
Posted by: プロペシア通販 | August 22, 2011 at 12:33 PM
1フィンペシア通販はこちらが安心です。
Posted by: フィンペシア通販 | August 22, 2011 at 02:44 PM
123フィンペシア通販はこちらが安心です。
Posted by: フィンペシア通販 | August 22, 2011 at 02:45 PM
23プロペシア副作用
プロペシア価格
プロペシア通販
プロペシア通販
Posted by: 離婚調停 | September 01, 2011 at 05:05 AM
45
フィンペシア
フィンペシア通販
プロペシア最安値
プロペシア通販
Posted by: プロペシア通販 | September 01, 2011 at 09:22 AM