Silicon-free thin-film photovoltaic solar cells are now commercially available in early production runs. These differ from the next generation thin film cell described in a previous post in that they are applied to the substrate by a sputtering process that was developed in the semiconductor industry and is been adapted for use in producing solar cells, rather than by adapting a printing process as is being done in the next generation of thin-film cells. Silicon-free solar cells could easily gain momentum from the current world wide shortage of silicon. These cells are currently applied to a stainless steel substrate, although there is indication that they could be applied to a plastic substrate in the future. These may well be the low cost cells for the next few years until the potential of silicon-free, thin-film cells produced by printing can be evaluated.
The two companies that I have researched both use Copper Indium Gallium diSelenide (CIGS) cells. CIGS cells are very efficient having higher efficiency than the crystalline Silicon cells now in common use. CIGS cells are very stable showing little if any degradation over their long life. Cells have been in the field for 17 years and exposed to the rigors of space with very stable performance. Life expectancy is projected to be 20-30 years, among the longest if not the longest of all cell types. This material exhibits "self-healing" properties that may correct for very small manufacturing defects and operational damage which may help explain their long life span. No toxic materials are used in the manufacturing process unlike some other silicon-free cell materials.
The claim of the companies in this business is that the manufacturing process being used is the key element in being able to produce low cost solar cells. They use a continuous roll-to-roll vacuum process in which the solar cell material is sputtered on the moving substrate. The cell material can be applied in layers with each layer having different properties that can enhance the cells performance. Similar process are used in the architectural glass industry, in producing hard drives, making optical filters and in making flat-panel displays.
DayStar Technologies was founded in 1997 and has been developing its solar cell and manufacturing techniques since that time. According to DayStar "Sputtering is used extensively in the flat-panel display and computer hard-drive industries. Sputtering is easily scaled to large dimensions (on the order of 3-4 meters in some cases) and, when combined with DayStar’s other proprietary film deposition methodologies, enables a highly reproducible, and hence inexpensive, Photovoltaic Foil™ manufacturing process."
DayStar describes sputtering as follows: "Sputtering is a vacuum evaporation process which physically removes portions of a coating material called the target, and deposits a thin, firmly bonded film onto an adjacent surface called the substrate. The process occurs by bombarding the surface of the sputtering target with gaseous ions under high voltage acceleration. As these ions collide with the target, atoms or occasionally entire molecules of the target material are ejected and propelled against the substrate, where they form a very tight bond. The resulting coating is held firmly to the surface by mechanical forces, although, in some cases, an alloy or chemical bond may result."
"The Company is performing low risk, incremental manufacturing development steps to reach its Gigawatt scale, roll-to-roll manufacturing goal avoiding development of singular, high cost and risk manufacturing line development." The company started selling products in early 2005 and has made announcements on three purchase agreements:
On March 14, 2005 DayStar and Auxilia, Inc. signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) regarding design and development of fully integrated photovoltaic power systems for the unmanned airship (lighter-than-air vehicle) marketplace. Low cost, serviceability and range of coverage make airships ideal for a variety of communications, surveillance, data relay, and broadband applications for military and commercial telecommunications. DayStar and Auxilia will focus on integrating DayStar's proprietary LightFoil™ photovoltaic power product with Auxilia's products. LightFoil’s™ lightweight, high performance and form factor flexibility is derived from a unique design which consists of high efficiency CIGS solar cells deposited on thin titanium foil less than the thickness of common household aluminum foil.
On June 9, 2005 the company announced that they had signed a purchase agreement with Blitzstrom, GmbH for Blitzstrom’s purchase of DayStar’s exclusive TerraFoil™ solar cells. Samples for module and array testing will be delivered in the near future, with initial product shipments slated for the third quarter of 2005. Full realization of the purchase agreement would result in revenues of up to $60 million using today’s market price for the silicon cells they replace. Near term costs are likely to exceed projected revenue under this contractual arrangement until DayStar transitions its production of TerraFoil™ solar cells from the existing Gen II line to its planned lower cost Gen III production. TerraFoil™ solar cells are their alternative to to silicon wafer solar cells currently used in flat plate PV modules. They can be assembled into modules of the same size and capacity as current Silicon cells. A previous post discusses this sale in more detail.
On July 11, 2005 the company announced a purchase agreement for up to 500-kilowatts of TerraFoil-SP™ cells with monthly delivery beginning later in 2005 and escalating in volume through the end of 2006. The TerraFoil-SP™ cell is a small form factor product designed to be used in consumer electronic devices.
My interpretation of their status is that the Gen II line, which is in operation now, may either a batch-continuous process or a narrow width roll-to-roll line. GEN III is a roll-to-roll process with greater efficiency than the Gen II line. See their paper on manufacturing of solar cells for an explanation of how they plan on increasing production rates and efficiencies through progressively more sophisticated processes. Presumably the LightFoil™ and the TerraFoil-SP™ are relatively high margin products and could be made on the Gen II line. To deliver on the Blitzstrom agreement will require successful operation of the Gen III line and therefore involves some risk, as this line has not been proven.
Miasole is a relatively young company with somewhat similar technology. A couple of press releases are my only clues to their status.
A 5/11/2004 press release stated: "Miasole, formerly Raycom Technologies, has developed a new low cost manufacturing process for the production of solar cells on flexible stainless steel foil. Miasole's technology is based on a proprietary vacuum deposition sputtering technology which is used to apply a thin-film of light absorbing semiconductor material composed of copper, indium, gallium and selenium, more commonly known as CIGS. The CIGS material and other thin-film layers are deposited in a continuous process in the vacuum system on stainless steel foil. Miasole's CIGS solar cells offer a direct replacement for conventional silicon based cells, at a fraction of the cost.
The new funding is earmarked to transition the Company's demonstrated R&D process to an existing high volume production system rated for 5MW of annual solar cell output. Last year Miasole demonstrated solar cells with 12 percent conversion efficiency, a level competitive with market dominant multi-crystalline silicon solar cells."
They raised another $16 million according to a 6/10/05 article on SiliconValley.com. "Venture firms are enthusiastic, and Miasolé, in particular, has drawn attention -- already producing cheap, high-quality hard disks for disk drives, which Chief Executive David Pearce used at a previous optical components company. ... Last year, Miasolé's Pearce predicted his (products) would be available during the first quarter of this year. He has taken his first orders, but now plans to make his first delivery next month: "Honestly speaking, it has taken a little longer to get the bugs out,'' he said.
Miasole's strong point is their manufacturing process. Their management team has a great deal of successful experience in developing sputtering manufacturing process. They apparently have a 4 ft wide roll-to-roll process built and in operation. Their website shows a prototype roll-to-roll production line. They show a schematic of their "Dual Cylindrical Rotating Magnetrons".
As far as cost of their products is concerned, DayStar is planning on having lower cost, higher volume continuous production facilities operating by the end of 2006 which should reduce their module cost from about $3.00 per watt to about $2.00 per watt. They project that in full scale production they could reduce costs to $1.00 per watt. Miesole has a chart on the bottom of their "Benefits" page that indicates that in 2005 they could produce electricity for $.18-.19 per Kwh and by 2010 they will be able to reduce the cost to $.10 per Kwh.
Resources:
DayStar Technologies, Inc., Halfmoon, NY, http://www.daystartech.com/
"Design Considerations and Implementation of Very Large scale Manufacturing of CIGS Solar Cells and Related Products", Proceedings of the 20th European PV Solar Energy Conference and Exhibit, J. R. Tuttle, et al, DayStar Technologies, June 2005
Miasole, San Jose, CA, http://www.miasole.com/solution.asp
"Miasole Closes $5.4 Million in Funding", FRESHNEWS.COM, 5/11/2004
"Vow of lower solar costs attracts venture capital", SiliconValley.com, 6/10/05
Technocrati tags: solar power, renewable energy, solar cells, thin film, sputtering
Nanosolar (www.nanosolar.com) is also working on silicon-free, thin-film, printable, roll-to-roll pv manufacturing processes. However, unlike the other companies mentioned above (Daystar and Miasole), they do not employ vacuum sputtering techniques. Rather, they have developed a nano-engineered self-aligning semiconductor solution that can be simply printed (actually printed, not sputtered) onto the substrate (see http://www.nanosolar.com/nanostructured.htm). The printing process is described by Nanosolar here (http://www.nanosolar.com/processtech.htm) including a video of the printing process. They claim serious competitive advantages over vacuum sputtering including enhanced throughput (100-2,000 feet/minute compared to 1 ft/min for sputtering) lower temperature and energy requirements, a much shorter energy payback period (3 weeks versus 1 year) - probably due to the decreased energy/temp requirements - greater materials utilization (near 100%) as well as other advantages (see http://www.nanosolar.com/economic.htm).
Of course, this all comes from their own website so we ought to be a bit skeptical. However, it looks like a more advanced and potentially more efficient process. In a game where the manufacturing process is the deciding factor in cost, any advancements in throughput, energy efficiency and materials utilization are going to cut costs. Nanosolar seems farther off from commericalization than Daystar but could eventually undercut their costs with their new manufacturing process. I'd love to hear what your research turns up on these guys.
Cheers,
Jesse Jenkins aka WattHead (watthead.blogspot.com)
Posted by: JesseJenkins | August 16, 2005 at 01:08 PM
I was listening to Martin Roscheisen, CEO of Nanosolar, when he talked at the Churchill Club dinner and talking about startups. It happened that one of his major investors was the host.
It came out that the major reason for the investment was that the prototype was so great.
From listening to these guys talk, one of the major developers, and the VC that put in the cash to make it happen, I feel that Nanosolar has to have something real and viable. Still, the notion of seeing independent, real numbers is very valid.
I am just saying that it would not surprise me at all if the numbers match or exceed the claims.
Posted by: Konrad | September 17, 2005 at 01:27 AM
anything happened to Miasole recently?
www.miasole.com WEB site not accessible.
i read that they are revonating their facility and maybe this includes the IT department?
Posted by: dean | January 30, 2006 at 06:28 PM
How about FSLR or ASTI?
Posted by: max | April 19, 2007 at 08:42 PM
Commute via electric bicycle w/trailer if needed and park the car for up 20-30 mi. one way. Put PV arrays on bike racks at work, stores etc.
Our atmosphere may be trashed long before all the carboniferous compounds are oxygenated (burned).
I agree we have to act on our own initiative to lower energy use but I would add that we have to get the green/independant party in power via a huge grassroots effort because in my opinion the Democrats and Republicans have sold us out to big business and spend us into poverty.
Posted by: D. Rix | August 14, 2007 at 03:47 PM
couple of problems with cigs -based cells. market could try to manipulate cost of copper/indium/gallium (selenium is very cheap and abundant respectively) and cadmium (common n-type material for cigs cells). also, cigs have not been proven in real-world application and prototypes have shown susceptible and are greatly affected by humidity. i do see these problems overcome within 1 year of mass production, so by spring 2009 in all liklihood and i do believe that $2/watt is possible, but $1/watt is going to be tough. It is interesting to note that with tax credits that roughly $1.7/watt for solar power translates to $1/watt after tax incentives for states without solar power incentives and $2.7/watt translate to roughly $1/watt in the states with the best incentives (hawaii, north carolina, oregon, and montana).
Posted by: sean costello | August 21, 2007 at 08:46 PM
by proven i meant long-term degradation performance statistics (although i cant believe they'd be any worse than silicon)
Posted by: sean costello | August 21, 2007 at 08:47 PM
What type of gasses are required in the manufacturing process of solar cells? Are there any purity requirements ie particles, moisture, oxygen, etc?
Posted by: Steve Simon | May 09, 2008 at 06:27 PM
Informative post! thanks a lot
Posted by: Solar Energy | April 20, 2009 at 09:15 AM
Great post!
Posted by: Solar Energy | April 20, 2009 at 09:16 AM
Daystar’s Comfort Ride Suspension systems are truly “Driven by Design”. Comfort Ride kits are specially designed to work with stock suspension components to keep costs down and quality high. High-density Progressive Polyurethane strut and spring spacers act as isolators to combine moderate amounts of lift without losing the comfortable ride you have come to expect. In torsion bar applications, re-indexed torsion keys allow you to “dial-in” the desired amount of lift in order to install larger tire and wheel packages. These front lifts are often combined with Daystar’s Greasable Super Shackles, add-a-leafs, or blocks and u-bolts to provide complete front and rear kits.
Posted by: daystar suspension | July 25, 2010 at 12:31 PM
Please see the latest info hear
http://www.narec.co.uk/sectors/distributed_energy/presentations_/
Sustainable Thin Film Photovoltaic Materials to Meet Multi-TWp Markets
By Dr. Ian Forbes Northumbria Photovoltaics Applications Centre, School of Computing, Engineering and Information Sciences,Northumbria University
&
Technology simulation: A fast track to PV efficiency enhancement
By Nick Cowern and Chihak Ahn
Nanomaterials and Electronics Group, Newcastle University
Posted by: Kanaga Gnana | September 22, 2010 at 12:06 AM
Patience is bitter, but its fruit is sweet .
Posted by: Nike Vandal | October 14, 2010 at 12:01 AM
Thanks for guiding me through this. Rarely do I find good entries that would walk me through.
Great post.
http://www.turkish-property-world.com/ Turkey Property
Posted by: Turkey Property | November 26, 2010 at 06:00 AM
Thanks for taking the time to share your view with us!
Vietnam Real Estate
Posted by: Real Estate in Vietnam | August 31, 2011 at 08:58 AM