Welcome to the Energy Blog


  • The Energy Blog is where all topics relating to The Energy Revolution are presented. Increasingly, expensive oil, coal and global warming are causing an energy revolution by requiring fossil fuels to be supplemented by alternative energy sources and by requiring changes in lifestyle. Please contact me with your comments and questions. Further Information about me can be found HERE.

    Jim


  • SUBSCRIBE TO THE ENERGY BLOG BY EMAIL

Google Links

After Gutenberg

Clean Break

The Oil Drum

Statistics

Blog powered by TypePad

« Tesla Update | Main | Electovaya Launces Higher Energy Density, Lower Cost "MN-Series" Li-ion Battery »

January 19, 2007

SOM Designs Zero Energy Chinese Skyscraper

Pearl_river_tower_exteriorThe 71-story, 2.2-million-square-foot Pearl River Tower, in the new city of Guangzhou, China, being built for the China National Tobacco Corp., is a “net”-zero-energy building designed by the storied architectural firm of Skidmore, Owings & Merrill (SOM), New York City, scheduled for completion in 2009.  The firm has set its sights on redefining one of its bread-and-butter project types, the corporate headquarters, into a model of high-tech sustainability

The Pearl River Tower epitomizes the super tall corporate headquarters building of tomorrow as an iconic, high performance structure, that is designed so that it potentially produces as much energy as it consumes. The building’s form guides wind to a pair of openings at its mechanical floors. The winds drive turbines that generate energy for the building’s heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems. The openings also provide structural relief, by allowing wind to pass through the building instead of pressing against it.

Pearl_river_tower_convex_sideOrientation, conservation, lighting efficiency, geothermal, energy reuse and energy storage techniques are used to enable the building to generate enough renewable power to meet its energy demands. This is done by five main methodologies:

1) By orienting the building towards the east the tower takes advantage of midday sun while the effects of late-day sun on the larger, southern exposure are minimized.

2) The south facade’s low-E-glass, double-layer curtain-wall system reduces heat gain, which leads to less demand on the HVAC systems.

3) The tower reclaims energy by routing each floor’s exhaust air into the south side’s double-layer curtain-wall cavity. This thermal barrier of hot dry air can then be reused on the mechanical floor for passive dehumidification.

4) The chilled slab concrete vaulted ceilings in the typical offices enhance daylighting, as well as cool the air drifting up from the underfloor ventilation system, the mass of the concrete providing energy storage. This system reduces energy used for cooling by 40 percent compared to a conventional HVAC system.

5) A geothermal heat sink is used to provide cooling water, so 100 degrees Fahrenheit water in the mechanical system’s return loop can be cooled to 75 degrees Fahrenheit prior to feeding the cooling towers, reducing the size of the mechanical plant by about 30 percent.

These five strategies reduce the building’s energy use by nearly 65 percent over a baseline of Chinese building codes. To reach the final goal of net zero energy, the design team incorporated three power-generating technologies: wind, integrated photovoltaics, and microturbines.

The wind turbines take advantage of the prevailing winds from the south, which generate a negative pressure at the north side, of the building. The tower’s curvilinear structure helps to force air through four turbine inlets in the facade, which SOM’s wind studies have predicted will speed up the wind’s velocity two-and-a-half times. SOM estimates the turbines will produce nearly 15 times more electricity than a typical stand-alone wind generator.

No details are provided for the size or location of the photovoltaics, except that they are on the south facade.

I assume the the microturbines are use to supplement power when the renewables do not generate enough power. 

About SOM

Louis Skidmore and Nathaniel Owings established an office in Chicago in 1936 and opened a branch in New York in 1937. The practice became Skidmore, Owings, & Merrill (SOM) in 1939 when John Merrill joined the partnership.

SOM's commitment to design quality coupled with it's sophistication in building technology applications has resulted in a portfolio that features some of the most important architectural accomplishments of this century. Lever House in New York City, Sears Tower in Chicago, John Hancock Tower in Chicago to name just a few. Currently, the firm is designing landmarks for the next generation, such as the Freedom Tower in New York City, and Burj Dubai which will be the world's tallest building when it is completed, as well as numerous other projects around the globe.

SOM’s work ranges from the design and engineering of individual buildings to the master planning and design of entire communities. The Firm has conceived, designed and built projects that include corporate office; banking and financial institutions; government buildings; public and private institutions; health care facilities; religious buildings; airports; commercial and retail facilities; recreational and sports facilities; university buildings; and residential developments.

SOM’s offices are in Chicago, Los Angeles, New York, San Francisco, Washington DC, London, Hong Kong and Shanghai.

Some examples of the buildings they have designed are:

Freedom Tower, site of World Trade Center, NYC, 2006 to 2011.
Trump International Hotel and Tower, tallest skyscraper in North America, Chicago, Illinois, 2005 to 2008
Burji Dubai, tallest building in the world, 2625 feet / 800 meters, Dubai, United Arab Emirates, 2004 to 2008.
New International Terminal, San Francisco, California, completed 2001.
Enerplex, North Building, Princeton, New Jersey, 1982.
Sears Tower, Chicago, Illinois, 1974 to 1976, more images
First Wisconsin Plaza, Madison, Wisconsin, 1974.
Haj Terminal, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, 1972 (circa), image
Weyerhaeuser Headquarters, near Tacoma, Washington, 1971
John Hancock Center, Chicago, Illinois, 1970.
Wells College Library, Aurora, New York, 1968.
Air Force Academy Chapel, Colorado Springs, Colorado, 1956 to 1962.
Lever House, the model for post war skyscrapers, New York City, 1950 to 1952, better image, history

Primary source: SOM’s Pearl River Tower, Russell Fortmeyer, Architectural Record, Dec. 2006

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451b5da69e200d834334aea53ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference SOM Designs Zero Energy Chinese Skyscraper:

» Design In Concrete from Design In Concrete
Apparently a lot of designers have started using the [Read More]

Comments

Designed by a NYC firm, I see. Too bad it didn't find a receptive audience closer to home. This is what the Freedom Tower should have been.

"I assume the the microturbines are use to supplement power when the renewables do not generate enough power."

I can't imagine that they would choose microturbines for standby power. Electricity from the grid will always be less expensive. Rather, I suspect that they have some heat requirements that can't always be met in more efficient ways, and chose to generate that heat it in a way that gave them some bonus electricity on the side.

Yes, Guangzhou is tropical and HOT most of the year, and it does sometimes get cold enough to want need heat for both hot water and space heat in January, when the average high dips into the 60s. (http://www.travelchinaguide.com/climate/guangzhou.htm).

"Designed by a NYC firm, I see"

Actually I think the Chicago office designed this building (according to an email I got from SOM after quoting some of the article above) .

Imagine the mayhem when another developer tries to build on their south side -- blocking their wind. Buildings cast a wind shadow roughly twice as long as their height. They even cast wind shadows upwind.

Maybe that's why it isn't happening in the U.S. Even if construction near such a skyscraper can be prevented, such restrictions would cause a steep decline in their property values, and the owners would undoubtedly seek redress.

The microturbines ought to be powered by solid oxide fuel cells running off biogas from the waste from this building. That would eliminate the need for fossil fuel backup.

Go for it SOM! I sure like their use of geothermal cooling! Excellent.

John,

I had a similar thought, but I can't imagine that the architects haven't planned for that. I mean, I know almost nothing about this sort of thing, and it occurred to *me*. It had to have occurred to them.

"I can't imagine that they would choose microturbines for standby power. Electricity from the grid will always be less expensive."
Careful. Even in the south, the grid is over-burdened and relatively unreliable; and, predominantly fuelled by nice, clean (!) coal.
On the other hand: South and west China are rich in natural gas; and in fact an extremely large natural gas pipeline expansion is currently well underway. Using that natural gas to provide any needed or topping electrical power - instead of drawing on a sometimes overwhelmed, coal-fired grid during the worst possible demand times-- makes a lot of sense.
What would make even more sense would be to feed that natural gas to a large high-temperature fuel cell (e.g,, from Siemens, or FuelCell Energy), with a microturbine on the exhaust end of the fuel cell both for increased efficiency (about 60%), plus, capturing the microturbines' exhaust for hot water heating.
The size of this building might also justifiy an anerobic digester for human waste treatment; to pull out the 'natural' gas from it to also run the fuel cell/microturbine. Several companies in California and Japan (e.g, Gill's Onions, Kirin Brewery, Sierra Nevada brewery) use biowaste digesters to run their large fuel cells in this manner.
DPH

Cool so biogas to fuel cell/turbine is a reality at these companies already? Any links. Very good news!

http://www.corporate-ir.net/ireye/ir_site.zhtml?ticker=fcel&script=412&item_id=913867

Excellent!

What this goes to show is that the energy problems we see as so very large will get solved in ways we can't imagine now. The real "natural resource" on this planet is human creativity. In the structure of a peaceful society with legal systems that allow good ideas to become reality, we will see these solutions flourish. The real challenge of the future is not limited energy supplies, but the nuture and care of this delicate thing we call civilization that enables these solutions to come about.

My bet is that there will be be very serious noise and vibration problems to deal with. I would like to know the details... how big the wind turbines are in diameter, how much power they can develop reletive to wind speed etc.

A good idea to have the microturbines as a means of supplemental power. With the energy prices at such highs, its behoves us to become energy efficient.

Hi,

Interesting article....."This is an iconic, high-performance building that is designed in harmony with its environment,"

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

. .




Batteries/Hybrid Vehicles