In the book Solar Revolution, The Economic Transformation of the Global Energy Industry, published by MIT Press, fund manager and former corporate buyout specialist Travis Bradford argues--on the basis of standard business and economic forecasting models--that over the next two decades solar energy will increasingly become the best and cheapest choice for most electricity and energy applications. Solar Revolution outlines the path by which the transition to solar technology and sustainable energy practices will occur.
Solar energy will eventually be the cheapest source of energy in nearly all markets and locations because PV can bypass the aging and fragile electricity grid and deliver its power directly to the end user, fundamentally changing the underlying economics of energy. As the scale of PV production increases and costs continue to decline at historic rates, demand for PV electricity will outpace supply of systems for years to come.
A couple of quotes from the first chapter indicate the thrust of the book:
"For reasons that this book explores in full, solar energy will inevitably become the most economic solution for most energy applications and the only viable energy option for many throughout the world. Currently, sunlight is the only renewable-energy source that is ubiquitous enough to serve as the foundation of a global energy economy in all of the locations where energy will be required, from the industrialized world to the developing one."
"Increasingly and dramatically over the next few decades, however, consumers will turn directly to the sun for their energy. This will happen not because solar power is clean and green but because basic economic and political reasons compel us to make this choice."









It's very tempting to agree with Bradford's thesis that solar power will become the dominant energy source. But there may be another readily-available energy source: the hydrogen atom. Randy Mills and his startup company in New Jersey, Blacklight Power, claim there is about one million electron volts of (non-nuclear) energy available in every hydrogen atom. If this claim proves to be true, it will change the energy picture completely. See http://www.blacklightpower.com/
Posted by: Mick | September 08, 2006 at 09:55 PM
Blacklight Power claims to have developed new physics and has created a business plan that apparently bypasses the scientific process for economic gain. If Blacklight Power's is correct, they have likely stumbled on the most important scientific finding of mankind. We must be extremely skepticle of claims of this magnitude. Furthermore, we should be extremely weary of this company's financial motivations and its decision to sidestep the scientific process.
Posted by: Josh | September 09, 2006 at 12:25 AM
Re: blacklight power. Interesting claim here. Catalyze a transition from groundstate hydrogen to a hitherto unknown lower energy state of n=1/2, releasing massive amounts of energy. Turns quantum mechanics on its head... this should be fun. Lots of spectroscopy and other analytical physchem suggests they are on to "something". If true, Mills is the next Einstein. Odds of this happening??? (femto) If there is something real there, how much ya wanna bet it's fiendishly difficult to scale up? Considering the ramifications, you'd think that we'd have heard more about it by now if there was something to it. Interesting web site.
Posted by: George | September 09, 2006 at 12:27 AM
The advent of 55% efficient full spectrum solar cells (set for manufacturing right about now?)boosted maybe 15% more with concentrating collectrors, plus cogeneration of heating/cooling power and recycled/desalinated water will probably make this prediction come true.
I think that large scale wind and wave power are a good low cost solution for the next few decades, maybe solar catching up in 15 years?
Melt the wind and wave systems down and recycle the metal in solar furnaces after their 30 to 40 year useful life span. Maybe drop those floating wind/wave power cement platforms in areas conducive to coral growth.
The Prairie National Park will be amazing especially once the wind towers are gone, and the coastal horizon will be free of wind towers, maybe they will have saved the life in the ocean from drift nets by then.
Plenty of healthy bison burgers and oysters and shrimp for all. That would be better than the doom we are headed for given the present political/industrial ignorance in the face of global climate disaster.
Posted by: amazingdrx | September 09, 2006 at 11:32 AM
Blacklight Power, claim
Yea, lots of claims. their battery was to see the light of day in 2007. Lots of press in 1999, and now nothing. No followup on thier promises of shipping product.
Not to mention that the laws of thermodyamics are violated. If you are shrinking the valence - releasing heat, to return the hydrogen to its normal state would absorb heat. Thus far this gets ignored.
Posted by: ota benga | September 09, 2006 at 11:47 AM
This Blacklight power thing is just inane. What next, enthusiasm over perpetual motion machines? The whole thing stinks of scam.
Posted by: Paul Dietz | September 09, 2006 at 12:01 PM
Solar will become economical much faster than most people think. Bradford is spot on.
LANL just reported a significant lab result using a silicon crystalline film.
http://www.renewableenergyaccess.com/rea/news/story;jsessionid=82F28748C708455935D6BC76755C4C14?id=45919
Posted by: disdaniel | September 09, 2006 at 03:34 PM
I think the whole notion of abandoning the "aging and fragile" electricity grid is poisonous for renewable energy. Unless you are in the wilderness far away from anywhere, disconnecting from the electricity grid altogether or just in part is stupid!
Anything you can do disconnected, you can do better when connected. A large grid increases security of supply greatly. If the electricity grid is aging and fragile, then upgrade and reinforce it - don't build something completely new, i.e. personal electricity storage devices (fuel cells, batteries, etc.).
The electricity grid is a friend of renewable energy, not an opponenet!
Posted by: Thomas | September 10, 2006 at 06:18 PM
Sure Thomas, but with distributed generation and storage the grid is a lot more stable. Reliability will increase without huge new expenditures just to boost transmission capacity.
Maybe some new transmission will be required though, from wind on the great plains and wave/wind power installations offshore. A lot of new storage will be necessary.
Most distributed in cars, homes, and businesses, but some in devices maintained by utility companies like super conducting energy storage systems here is Wisconsin. And possibly flywheel storage mounted on large wind and wave systems.
Posted by: amazingdrx | September 11, 2006 at 12:23 AM
Sure, with storage you save money for power line upgrade, but you still have to pay for the storage.
I agree 100% that PHEV and BEV will be excellent storage devices and possible load balancing devices if made smart enough.
Still, my personal feeling is that transmission of power (renewable, of course) will be more economically efficienct than storing it locally.
I think the strongest card 'storage' holds in this context is the fact that is doesn't require massive federal (intergovernment in Europe) scale investment over several years before it starts working.
If storage can be made cheap, then I will definitely win because of its flexibility, both technically and financially.
Posted by: Thomas | September 11, 2006 at 06:03 AM
I have met with Travis and he is a bright man that has put in a great deal of research to his position. Solar is a cultural application as much as scientific. What drives solar in Germany and Japan is not just financial, that is the sympton. It is a deeper, long-term perspective on a serious issue. When the traditional pay-back thinking is put on the back burner, solar instantly rises to the top of the alternative energies currently available on a broad scale.
Posted by: Brad | October 11, 2006 at 04:04 PM