Welcome to the Energy Blog


  • The Energy Blog is where all topics relating to The Energy Revolution are presented. Increasingly, expensive oil, coal and global warming are causing an energy revolution by requiring fossil fuels to be supplemented by alternative energy sources and by requiring changes in lifestyle. Please contact me with your comments and questions. Further Information about me can be found HERE.

    Jim


  • SUBSCRIBE TO THE ENERGY BLOG BY EMAIL

After Gutenberg

Clean Break

The Oil Drum

Statistics

Blog powered by Typepad

« TXU to Spend $10 Billion on Power Plants | Main | AFS Trinity Discloses Info on 250 mpg Plug-in »

May 03, 2006

Comments

New Reader

This is only tangentially related, so I apologize.

But I was wondering if you could post something on conversion of CO2 to methane. I read recently that research is being conducted that hopes to convert sequestered CO2 to methane, then burn the methane for power, creating more CO2, convert to methane, etc.

Also, I was wondering if you could provide your thoughts on how coal can be extracted in a more environmentally-friendly manner. Even if coal plants start sequestering CO2, it seems like ramping up production means destroying the environment via extraction.

Jim Robb

re:Program to Mitigate the Consumption of Oil

Why not add a higher sales tax for vehicles that get poor MPG? I'm thinking about light trucks, SUVs and passenger vehicles.

And remove the tax incentive for businesses purchasing heavy SUVs.

Robert McLeod

New Reader:

You cannot violate conservation of energy. Sure you can create CH4 from CO2 but the process will be endothermic.

amazingdrx

Yep new reader, convert coal to fuel right underground with electric plasma drilling. The same with oil/tar sands.

The electric power coming from huge wind machines. Vaporized and liquified fuel is extracted and refined in one step.

This eliminates the massive use of water in most schemes and stores the wind power in the form of fuel. The problem is that it still produces CO 2.

The latest electric car to come on the market, mentioned in an article here, uses a lithium ion phosphate battery that stores the equivalent transportation energy to a gallon of gas at a weight of only 75 pounds.

That makes electric cars match the utility of liquid fueled vehicles. The weight of batteries and electric motor compares favorably to the weight of the internal combustion equipment it replaces. With zero emissions.

A lithium ion nano phosphate quick charge (5 minutes to 90% charge)battery with an even better power to weight ratio is under testing in cars right now, by Subaru and Altairno in Nevada.

That makes liquid fuel unecessary for vehicles. Wind, water, and solar power can provide the energy needed to charge these cars.

Forget coal, oil, tar sands, use the wind power directly. Electric cars have an order of magnitude fewer moving parts than internal combustion vehicles, making them much cheaper to manufacture.

Mass production of batteries, PV cells, geothermal heat pumps, wind, solar, and water powered generating equipment will vring the cost down to a much lower level than we pay for energy now.

Wind is already down to 2 cents per kwh, that equates to about 20 cents per gallon gasoline. Back to 50s prices.

Charge your car from your own home solar and wind installations and drive free, once the few years payback period is over.

Oh yeah, and CO 2 to methane? a process already exists and is under testing right now that uses algae in solar collectors to convert CO 2 and other power plant emissions to liquid fuel and methane.

Big Gav

amazingdrx - while CO2 to algae conversion is a neat development it still seems to be an incremental improvement to me - the carbon dioxide from the power plant still gets released - you just get a second bite at the cherry before it makes it into the atmosphere.

So its better than the current state of affairs but not really sustainable if you anticipate ever growing power consumption...

amazingdrx

That's true Gav. I like pure renewable electric power much better. Forget all combustion, except an ocasional campfire.

But if one needs liquid fuel, algae maybe the cleanest source. Until battery technology improves to 8 pounds per electrical equivalent of a gallon of gas, air travel will still require liquid fuel.

The best current manufactured battery appears to weigh around 70 pounds per gallon of gas equivalent. But research is getting very close to that 8 pound benchmark.

But burning coal or oil? That's just global suicide based on greed and ignorance.

another new reader

Dear new reader,
I think what you are talking about is extracting methane from abandoned coal mines by injecting CO2. This is somewhat similiar to EOR (enhanced oil recovery) process where CO2 is injected into oil mines to enhance oil recovery. However, for coal bed methane process (assuming that you are refering to it), captured CO2 is injected into old and abandoned coal mines (most of which still contain signifcant amount of coal) which displaces methane trapped between the coal seam and is eventually taken out for energy production.It is not at all concerned with converting CO2 to methane.

Sandeep

Hi all,

I read the article, its good and informative about Oxyfuel Plant.
Please look for, http://www.bdmairseperationplants.com for more information about different Gas plants and tanks and about its manufacturing process and more.............

The comments to this entry are closed.

. .




Batteries/Hybrid Vehicles