About Sodium-Sulfur (NaS) Batteries
Sodium Sulfur (NaS) batteries are high capacity battery systems developed for electric power applications. A NaS battery consists of liquid (molten) sulfur at the positive electrode and liquid (molten) sodium at the negative electrode as active materials separated by a solid beta alumina ceramic electrolyte. The electrolyte allows only the positive sodium ions to go through it and combine with the sulfur to form sodium polysulfides.
2Na + 4S = Na2S4
During discharge, as positive Na+ ions flow through the electrolyte and electrons flow in the external circuit of the battery producing about 2 volts. This process is reversible as charging causes sodium polysulfides to release the positive sodium ions back through the electrolyte to recombine as elemental sodium. This hermetically sealed battery is kept at approximately 300 oC and is operated under conditions such that the active materials at both electrodes are liquid and the electrolyte is solid. At this temperature, since both active materials react rapidly and because the internal resistance is low, the NAS battery performs well. Because of reversible charging and discharging the NAS battery can be used continuously.
NaS battery cells are efficient ( about 89%) and have a pulse power capability over six times their continuous rating (for 30 seconds). This attribute enables the NaS battery to be economically used in combined power quality and peak shaving applications.
Multiple batteries are installed in a single, heated and vacuum insulated module as shown in this rendition.
Only one company is producing NaS batteries, NGK, of Japan.
The two largest NGK NAS® battery systems were installed since 2003 and are now in operation. One is located at Hitachi, Ltd.’s Automotive Systems Group. The system has enabled Hitachi to significantly reduce electricity costs through load leveling (using electricity supplied by the grid at night during the daytime). Consisting of four 2MW NAS® batteries, this system has the same output wattage as an 8MW system installed at the Morigasaki Water Reclamation Center operated by the Bureau of Sewerage, Tokyo Metropolitan Government. Both systems have an energy capacity of approximately 58MWh, making them the largest energy storage battery systems in the world. These NAS® battery systems also provide backup power supplies in the event of power outages or momentary voltage sags, contributing to more reliable operations at customer sites.
NaS battery technology has been used at over 30 sites in Japan totaling more than 28 MW with stored energy suitable for 8 hours daily peak shaving. Combined power quality and peak shaving applications in the U.S. market are under evaluation.
Resources:
Electric Storage Association, Technologies & Applications, Technologies/NaS
NGK Insulators, LTD. , Power Business, Nagoya, Japan
Technorati tags: batteries, energy storage, energy, technology









application
strucher
data sheet
specification
Posted by: jojo | July 15, 2006 at 06:14 AM
Historically, UPS units were very expensive and were most likely to be used on expensive computer systems and in areas where the power supply is interrupted frequently. For valuable information on why you should protect you equipment with an UPS: http://www.batterybackupguide.com/ups-battery-backup.htm
Posted by: Victoria | August 04, 2006 at 06:07 PM
how do they keep the batteries at 300 degrees C. this is a tremendous amount of energy, isn't it?
Posted by: Glen Inouye | September 24, 2007 at 12:49 AM
It will require a significant amount of energy to initially raise the cells to 300 degrees, but since they are well insulated, it requires very little to keep them at that temperature. In fact the energy wasted during the charge discharge cycles (owing to the cells not being 100% efficient) is enough to maintain them at that temperature.
Posted by: stolennomenclature | November 05, 2007 at 10:09 PM
Regarding efficiency of 89%, I assume this does not include efficiency losses of inverter. Assuming 15 - 20 % losses in AC to DC and back, would total round trip efficiency be closer to 69% - 74%?
Also, I've read that NGK system can cycle 2,500 and also 4,000. Which is correct, and what happens to system at maximum cycles?
Posted by: Charles R. Toca | November 08, 2007 at 05:00 PM
Vanadium Redox batteris are also used for high level of energy storage. Out of these two,which battery system is more efficir=ent and cost effective
Posted by: m.c.bhatnagar | May 29, 2008 at 12:06 AM
I have a concept idea whereby individuals with a minimum investment to pay for the costs of this mobile generator to generate, store and will be able use or sell excess electricity to National Grids.This will result in significant reductions of fossil fuel dependency. The idea has merit is workable and will make any country to be less fossil fuel dependent.The idea is already in the hands of an American Investment company who have expressed more than a passing interest in it.I am a student with a mind full of ideas on how to improve the lives of many suffering under the burden of high fossil fuel costs. I am hoping that with the help of this American Investment Company the yoke of bondage caused by high fossil fuel costs will be broken. Errol Smythe
Posted by: Errol Smythe | July 18, 2008 at 06:53 AM
America is sucking hind tit on the energy front. Why? check out all of the independent developers of technology that is available now. they're dead!
Posted by: alexander carlyle | July 29, 2008 at 01:41 PM
Can you confirm that the Sodium Sulphur battery was first conceived and researched at the Electricity Council Research Centre, Capenhurst, Nr Chester,UK in the early 70s
Posted by: Peter Francis | October 10, 2008 at 03:09 PM
Hello,
I was wondering why the electrodes have to be in molten estate. Is it to facilitate ion's movement, or is it imposed by thermodinamical constraints ?(chemical reactions efficiency dependant on operating temperature leads to 300ºC op. temp)
Thanks
Posted by: david espinosa duran | February 12, 2009 at 08:31 AM
the new company combinding technology to take you off the grid is based in new york longIsland I think they go by the name Energenics systems i saw them at a LIFT meting
Posted by: Robert Wilkinson | April 13, 2009 at 03:57 PM
Hi, I was wondering if anyone has an idea of what the cost (USD) per MW installed capacity is of these batteries and how long they take to charge once fully exhausted?
Thanks
Shane
Posted by: Shane Thatcher | June 09, 2009 at 06:47 AM